On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:31 AM Michal Simek wrote:
> Static analyzer tool found that the ret variable is not initialized but
> code expects ret value >=0 when pinconf is skipped in the first pinmux
> loop. The same expectation is for pinmux in a pinconf loop.
> That's why initialize ret to 0 to
On 12/03/2021 07:31, Michal Simek wrote:
> Static analyzer tool found that the ret variable is not initialized but
> code expects ret value >=0 when pinconf is skipped in the first pinmux
> loop. The same expectation is for pinmux in a pinconf loop.
> That's why initialize ret to 0 to avoid uniniti
Static analyzer tool found that the ret variable is not initialized but
code expects ret value >=0 when pinconf is skipped in the first pinmux
loop. The same expectation is for pinmux in a pinconf loop.
That's why initialize ret to 0 to avoid uninitialized ret value in first
loop or reusing ret val
3 matches
Mail list logo