Am Sonntag, 24. Februar 2013, 23:42:32 schrieb Linus Walleij:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > [Me]
> >
> >> This make me suspect that you have this ugly patch in some
> >> private repo and I will be seeing it again and again :-(
> >
> > All my s3c24xx work is done is
Am Sonntag, 24. Februar 2013, 01:40:58 schrieb Linus Walleij:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Currently the fallback functions when pinctrl is not being built do
> > return either NULL or 0, either no pinctrl handle or no error,
> > making them fail silently.
> >
> > A
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> [Me]
>> This make me suspect that you have this ugly patch in some
>> private repo and I will be seeing it again and again :-(
>
> All my s3c24xx work is done is my spare time, so I have to confess I came up
> with this "ugly patch" all by
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Currently the fallback functions when pinctrl is not being built do
> return either NULL or 0, either no pinctrl handle or no error,
> making them fail silently.
>
> All drivers using pinctrl do only test for error conditions, which
> made f
Currently the fallback functions when pinctrl is not being built do
return either NULL or 0, either no pinctrl handle or no error,
making them fail silently.
All drivers using pinctrl do only test for error conditions, which
made for example the i2c-s3c2410 driver fail on a devicetree based
machin
5 matches
Mail list logo