On 02/07, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:10:11PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > It is not clear to me why other posix_cpu_timer_del's above can't fail..
> > May be you can add a comment.
>
> Sure, I'll add more comments.
Yes, please. This will help the next reader to
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:10:11PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> First of all, thank you so much. I knew it was a good idea to cc you ;)
:-)
> On 02/06, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> >
> > In do_cpu_nanosleep() we do posix_cpu_timer_create(), but forgot
> > corresponding posix_cpu_timer_del(), what
Stanislaw,
First of all, thank you so much. I knew it was a good idea to cc you ;)
And let me repeat that I forgot everything about this code.
On 02/06, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>
> In do_cpu_nanosleep() we do posix_cpu_timer_create(), but forgot
> corresponding posix_cpu_timer_del(), what lead
In do_cpu_nanosleep() we do posix_cpu_timer_create(), but forgot
corresponding posix_cpu_timer_del(), what lead to task_struct leak.
Reported-and-tested-by: Tommi Rantala
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka
---
kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletio
4 matches
Mail list logo