Re: [PATCH] possible bug in quota format v2 support

On 2005-03-31 16:21:55 (+0200), Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > I'm afraid that there is a bug in quota format v2 delete qentry. > > (The root block shouldn't be put into free blk list even if there isn't > > any entry in quota file, right?) > > > > This one line patch may

Re: [PATCH] possible bug in quota format v2 support

On 2005-03-31 16:21:55 (+0200), Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm afraid that there is a bug in quota format v2 delete qentry. (The root block shouldn't be put into free blk list even if there isn't any entry in quota file, right?) This one line patch may fix it. Such

Re: [PATCH] possible bug in quota format v2 support

Hello, > I'm afraid that there is a bug in quota format v2 delete qentry. > (The root block shouldn't be put into free blk list even if there isn't > any entry in quota file, right?) > > This one line patch may fix it. Such case should not actually occur in normal operation but I agree that

[PATCH] possible bug in quota format v2 support

Hi Jan, I'm afraid that there is a bug in quota format v2 delete qentry. (The root block shouldn't be put into free blk list even if there isn't any entry in quota file, right?) This one line patch may fix it. Thanks. - Niu --- linux-2.6.7/fs/quota_v2.c 2005-01-21 16:47:34.0 +0800 +++

[PATCH] possible bug in quota format v2 support

Hi Jan, I'm afraid that there is a bug in quota format v2 delete qentry. (The root block shouldn't be put into free blk list even if there isn't any entry in quota file, right?) This one line patch may fix it. Thanks. - Niu --- linux-2.6.7/fs/quota_v2.c 2005-01-21 16:47:34.0 +0800 +++

Re: [PATCH] possible bug in quota format v2 support

Hello, I'm afraid that there is a bug in quota format v2 delete qentry. (The root block shouldn't be put into free blk list even if there isn't any entry in quota file, right?) This one line patch may fix it. Such case should not actually occur in normal operation but I agree that with