Hi Krzysztof,
On 3/9/21 1:11 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 17:02, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 4:33 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/03/2021 16:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
From: Arnd Bergmann
Some of the extcon interfaces
On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 18:06 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:29 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > - depends on EXTCON || !EXTCON
>
> I stumbled over this.
> What is the point of having this line at all?
> What magic trick does it serve for?
The logic was somewhat
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 17:02, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 4:33 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >
> > On 08/03/2021 16:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > From: Arnd Bergmann
> > >
> > > Some of the extcon interfaces have a fallback implementation that can
> > > be used when EXTCON
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:06 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:29 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > - depends on EXTCON || !EXTCON
>
> I stumbled over this.
> What is the point of having this line at all?
> What magic trick does it serve for?
Okay, it seems I can answer my
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 4:52 PM Matti Vaittinen
wrote:
>
> Hello Arnd,
>
> On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 16:29 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann
> >
> > I assume there is no reason to actually build this driver without
> > extcon
> > support, so a hard dependency is the easiest fix.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:29 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> - depends on EXTCON || !EXTCON
I stumbled over this.
What is the point of having this line at all?
What magic trick does it serve for?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 4:33 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> On 08/03/2021 16:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann
> >
> > Some of the extcon interfaces have a fallback implementation that can
> > be used when EXTCON is disabled, but some others do not, causing a
> > build failure:
Hello Arnd,
On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 16:29 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> I assume there is no reason to actually build this driver without
> extcon
> support, so a hard dependency is the easiest fix. Alternatively the
> header file could be extended to provide additional
On 08/03/2021 16:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> Some of the extcon interfaces have a fallback implementation that can
> be used when EXTCON is disabled, but some others do not, causing a
> build failure:
>
> drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c:261:9: error: implicit
From: Arnd Bergmann
Some of the extcon interfaces have a fallback implementation that can
be used when EXTCON is disabled, but some others do not, causing a
build failure:
drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c:261:9: error: implicit declaration of
function 'devm_extcon_register_notifier_all'
10 matches
Mail list logo
