I'm running benh's next branch as of thismorning, and SMT was off.
>
Oh! This looks like a different hang than the one I tried to fix. My patch
("powerpc, kexec: Fix "Processor X is stuck" issue during kexec from ST mode")
which is already in benh's next branc
Hi Srivatsa,
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Srivatsa S. Bhat
wrote:
> And with the following hunk added (which I had forgotten earlier), it worked
> just
> fine on powernv :-)
How are the patches coming along?
I just hung a machine here while attempting to kexec. It appears to
have onlined al
On 06/06/2014 05:59 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 06/04/2014 03:39 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 01:58 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>> Yep, that makes sense. But unfortunately I don't have enough insight into
>>> why exactly powerpc has to online the CPUs before d
On 06/06/2014 11:57 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 06:00:43PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> On 06/04/2014 07:16 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:09:25AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 01:58 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 06:00:43PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 06/04/2014 07:16 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:09:25AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 01:58 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> >>> Yep, that makes sense. But unfortunately I
On 06/06/2014 05:59 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> +bool kexec_cpu_wake(void)
> +{
> + kexec_smp_down(NULL);
> +
> + /* NOTREACHED */
> + return true;
> +}
> +
This function doesn't have to return anything, so we can define it as void.
The bool is a remnant of my previous attempt at m
On 06/04/2014 07:11 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:58:40AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> On 05/28/2014 07:01 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:25:34PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
If we try to perform a kexec when the machine is in ST (Single-Thre
On 06/04/2014 07:16 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:09:25AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 01:58 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>> Yep, that makes sense. But unfortunately I don't have enough insight into
>>> why exactly powerpc has to online the
On 06/04/2014 03:39 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 01:58 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> Yep, that makes sense. But unfortunately I don't have enough insight into
>> why exactly powerpc has to online the CPUs before doing a kexec. I just
>> know from the commit log and
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:09:25AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 01:58 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> > Yep, that makes sense. But unfortunately I don't have enough insight into
> > why exactly powerpc has to online the CPUs before doing a kexec. I just
> > know fro
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:58:40AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 05/28/2014 07:01 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:25:34PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> >> If we try to perform a kexec when the machine is in ST (Single-Threaded)
> >> mode
> >> (ppc64_cpu --smt=off), t
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 01:58 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Yep, that makes sense. But unfortunately I don't have enough insight into
> why exactly powerpc has to online the CPUs before doing a kexec. I just
> know from the commit log and the comment mentioned above (and from my own
> experiments)
On 05/28/2014 07:01 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:25:34PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> If we try to perform a kexec when the machine is in ST (Single-Threaded) mode
>> (ppc64_cpu --smt=off), the kexec operation doesn't succeed properly, and we
>> get the following message
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:25:34PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> If we try to perform a kexec when the machine is in ST (Single-Threaded) mode
> (ppc64_cpu --smt=off), the kexec operation doesn't succeed properly, and we
> get the following messages during boot:
>
> [0.089866] POWER8 perfor
If we try to perform a kexec when the machine is in ST (Single-Threaded) mode
(ppc64_cpu --smt=off), the kexec operation doesn't succeed properly, and we
get the following messages during boot:
[0.089866] POWER8 performance monitor hardware support registered
[0.089985] power8-pmu: PMAO re
15 matches
Mail list logo
