On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:29:58 +0200 Rodolfo Giometti
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:52:47AM +0200, Paul Chavent wrote:
> >
> > I would also prefer the separate ioctl. As you said it, it's a bit
> > annoying to switch from blocking mode to non blocking mode if we
> > need both mode. But i wa
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:52:47AM +0200, Paul Chavent wrote:
>
> I would also prefer the separate ioctl. As you said it, it's a bit
> annoying to switch from blocking mode to non blocking mode if we
> need both mode. But i was not sure about the preferences of the
> maintainer : (i) change the ap
On 10/15/2013 09:55 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:43:50 +0200 Rodolfo Giometti
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:47:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:40:32 +0200 Paul Chavent wrote:
The PPS_FETCH ioctl is blocking still the reception of a PPS
even
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:43:50 +0200 Rodolfo Giometti
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:47:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:40:32 +0200 Paul Chavent
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The PPS_FETCH ioctl is blocking still the reception of a PPS
> > > event. But, in some case, one
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:47:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:40:32 +0200 Paul Chavent wrote:
>
> > The PPS_FETCH ioctl is blocking still the reception of a PPS
> > event. But, in some case, one may immediately need the last event
> > date. This patch allow to get the re
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:40:32 +0200 Paul Chavent wrote:
> The PPS_FETCH ioctl is blocking still the reception of a PPS
> event. But, in some case, one may immediately need the last event
> date. This patch allow to get the result of PPS_FETCH if the device
> has the O_NONBLOCK flag set.
Are the P
The PPS_FETCH ioctl is blocking still the reception of a PPS
event. But, in some case, one may immediately need the last event
date. This patch allow to get the result of PPS_FETCH if the device
has the O_NONBLOCK flag set.
Signed-off-by: Paul Chavent
Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti
---
drivers/pps/
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:42:56AM +0200, Paul Chavent wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I haven't had any feedback for weeks. I join a patch with more
> details in the commit message if needed.
If I well remember I already acked this patch. So please add my
Acked-by line to the patch.
> Do you know someone resp
wrote:
Signed-off-by: Paul Chavent
Acked: Rodolfo Giometti
>From 370fca528140f879957a1b717fe9c13855d5c7f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Chavent
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 10:09:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] pps : add non blocking option to PPS_FETCH ioctl (v2).
This new version add a commit
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:20:38AM +0200, Paul Chavent wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paul Chavent
Acked: Rodolfo Giometti
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giome...@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver giome...@linux.it
Embedded Systems phone:
Signed-off-by: Paul Chavent
---
drivers/pps/pps.c | 57 +--
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pps/pps.c b/drivers/pps/pps.c
index 7173e3a..86ff57e 100644
--- a/drivers/pps/pps.c
+++ b/drivers/pps/pps.c
@@ -1
11 matches
Mail list logo
