On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 03:50:39PM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote:
> I learnt, it's, alas, too late to drop the non PRCTL_SET_MM_MAP calls
> [1], so at least downgrade the write acquisition of mmap_sem as in the
> patch below (that should be stacked on the previous one or squashed).
>
> Cyrill, you me
Le 18/04/2019 à 15:50, Michal Koutný a écrit :
I learnt, it's, alas, too late to drop the non PRCTL_SET_MM_MAP calls
[1], so at least downgrade the write acquisition of mmap_sem as in the
patch below (that should be stacked on the previous one or squashed).
Cyrill, you mentioned lock changes in
On Thu 18-04-19 15:50:39, Michal Koutny wrote:
> I learnt, it's, alas, too late to drop the non PRCTL_SET_MM_MAP calls
> [1], so at least downgrade the write acquisition of mmap_sem as in the
> patch below (that should be stacked on the previous one or squashed).
>
> Cyrill, you mentioned lock cha
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 03:50:39PM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote:
> I learnt, it's, alas, too late to drop the non PRCTL_SET_MM_MAP calls
> [1], so at least downgrade the write acquisition of mmap_sem as in the
> patch below (that should be stacked on the previous one or squashed).
>
> Cyrill, you me
I learnt, it's, alas, too late to drop the non PRCTL_SET_MM_MAP calls
[1], so at least downgrade the write acquisition of mmap_sem as in the
patch below (that should be stacked on the previous one or squashed).
Cyrill, you mentioned lock changes in [1] but the link seems empty. Is
it supposed to b
5 matches
Mail list logo