Hi,
>> Sylvan Munaut did something similar
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/5/168
>
> Missed that and duplicated the debugging :(
> Sorry Sylvain.
I should have followed up on the patch sooner, but I basically
finished testing it fixed all the issues and posted it just before
leaving for vacation
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 14:27 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Sylvan Munaut did something similar
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/5/168
>
> Missed that and duplicated the debugging :(
> Sorry Sylvain.
>
> I guess my patch may be preferable,
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> Sylvan Munaut did something similar
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/5/168
Missed that and duplicated the debugging :(
Sorry Sylvain.
I guess my patch may be preferable, since I happened to use the snprintf()
method that you suggest -- all th
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> Nice work. When did you start seeing this problem, 3.6 or so? I ask as
> it's probably something that should go to stable as well if so.
We happened to see it when we rebased to the 3.6 kernel, but as far as I
can see, the bug has bee
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 09:56 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 08:23:04PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > From: Roland Dreier
> >
> > print_prefix() passes a NULL buf to print_time() to get the length of
> > the time prefix; when printk times are enabled, the current code
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 08:23:04PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> From: Roland Dreier
>
> print_prefix() passes a NULL buf to print_time() to get the length of
> the time prefix; when printk times are enabled, the current code just
> returns the constant 15, which matches the format "[%5lu.%06lu]
From: Roland Dreier
print_prefix() passes a NULL buf to print_time() to get the length of
the time prefix; when printk times are enabled, the current code just
returns the constant 15, which matches the format "[%5lu.%06lu] " used
to print the time value. However, this is obviously incorrect whe
7 matches
Mail list logo
