Re: [PATCH] ptp: PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH depends on x86

2013-01-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 20:02 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:31:01PM -0500, Jeff Mahoney wrote: > > The EG20T PCH is only compatible with Intel Atom processors so it > > should depend on x86. > > Yes, there is something wrong with PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH. The last > several ti

Re: [PATCH] ptp: PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH depends on x86

2013-01-30 Thread Richard Cochran
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:31:01PM -0500, Jeff Mahoney wrote: > The EG20T PCH is only compatible with Intel Atom processors so it > should depend on x86. Yes, there is something wrong with PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH. The last several times I did 'make oldconfig' for various configs, it asked me whether to

[PATCH] ptp: PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH depends on x86

2013-01-30 Thread Jeff Mahoney
The EG20T PCH is only compatible with Intel Atom processors so it should depend on x86. Cc: Richard Cochran Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney --- drivers/ptp/Kconfig |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ config DP83640_PHY c