On 07/09/2012 02:19 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
I couldn't agree with Stephen Warren more.
Could you support DT and non-DT case for backwards compatibility?
Both cases are handled in the new version I just sent. I hope all other
concerns have also been addressed properly. If I forgot something
On 07/09/2012 02:19 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
I couldn't agree with Stephen Warren more.
Could you support DT and non-DT case for backwards compatibility?
Both cases are handled in the new version I just sent. I hope all other
concerns have also been addressed properly. If I forgot something
.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm-backlight: add regulator and GPIO support
>
> On 07/05/2012 02:12 AM, Alex Courbot wrote:
> > On 07/05/2012 04:57 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >> I agree. Non-DT
@vger.kernel.org;
linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm-backlight: add regulator and GPIO support
On 07/05/2012 02:12 AM, Alex Courbot wrote:
On 07/05/2012 04:57 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
I agree. Non-DT platforms have always used the callbacks to execute this
kind of code
4 matches
Mail list logo
