On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:23:57 -0800 Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 09:18 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 05:22:25 + Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/18/12 5:06 PM, "NeilBrown" wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >Hi Dan,
> > > > could you comment on
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 09:18 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 05:22:25 + Dan Williams wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 11/18/12 5:06 PM, "NeilBrown" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Hi Dan,
> > > could you comment on this please? Would it make sense to arrange for
> > >errors
> > > to propagate
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 05:22:25 + Dan Williams wrote:
>
>
> On 11/18/12 5:06 PM, "NeilBrown" wrote:
>
> >
> >Hi Dan,
> > could you comment on this please? Would it make sense to arrange for
> >errors
> > to propagate up? Or should we arrange to do a software-fallback in the
> >dma
> >
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 09:18 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 05:22:25 + Dan Williams d...@fb.com wrote:
On 11/18/12 5:06 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote:
Hi Dan,
could you comment on this please? Would it make sense to arrange for
errors
to propagate
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:23:57 -0800 Dan Williams d...@fb.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 09:18 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 05:22:25 + Dan Williams d...@fb.com wrote:
On 11/18/12 5:06 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote:
Hi Dan,
could you comment
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 05:22:25 + Dan Williams d...@fb.com wrote:
On 11/18/12 5:06 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote:
Hi Dan,
could you comment on this please? Would it make sense to arrange for
errors
to propagate up? Or should we arrange to do a software-fallback in the
dma
On 11/18/12 5:06 PM, "NeilBrown" wrote:
>
>Hi Dan,
> could you comment on this please? Would it make sense to arrange for
>errors
> to propagate up? Or should we arrange to do a software-fallback in the
>dma
> engine is a problem? What sort of things can cause error here anyway?
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
wrote:
> On Thursday 08 November 2012 12:15:26 Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:06:29 +0100
> > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> > > Subject: [PATCH] raid5: p
: panic() on dma_wait_for_async_tx() error
There is not much we can do on dma_wait_for_async_tx() error
so just panic() for now.
Cc: Neil Brown ne...@suse.de
Cc: Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com
Cc: Dan Williams d...@fb.com
Cc: Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com
Signed-off
On 11/18/12 5:06 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote:
Hi Dan,
could you comment on this please? Would it make sense to arrange for
errors
to propagate up? Or should we arrange to do a software-fallback in the
dma
engine is a problem? What sort of things can cause error here anyway?
On Thursday 08 November 2012 12:15:26 Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:06:29 +0100
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> > Subject: [PATCH] raid5: panic() on dma_wait_for_async_tx() error
> >
> > There is not much w
On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:06:29 +0100
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Subject: [PATCH] raid5: panic() on dma_wait_for_async_tx() error
>
> There is not much we can do on dma_wait_for_async_tx() error
> so just panic() for now.
>
> Cc: Ne
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Subject: [PATCH] raid5: panic() on dma_wait_for_async_tx() error
There is not much we can do on dma_wait_for_async_tx() error
so just panic() for now.
Cc: Neil Brown
Cc: Vinod Koul
Cc: Dan Williams
Cc: Tomasz Figa
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com
Subject: [PATCH] raid5: panic() on dma_wait_for_async_tx() error
There is not much we can do on dma_wait_for_async_tx() error
so just panic() for now.
Cc: Neil Brown ne...@suse.de
Cc: Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com
Cc: Dan Williams d
On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:06:29 +0100
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com wrote:
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com
Subject: [PATCH] raid5: panic() on dma_wait_for_async_tx() error
There is not much we can do on dma_wait_for_async_tx() error
so just panic
On Thursday 08 November 2012 12:15:26 Alan Cox wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:06:29 +0100
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com wrote:
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com
Subject: [PATCH] raid5: panic() on dma_wait_for_async_tx() error
16 matches
Mail list logo