On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 02:13:03PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 02:32:04AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> >>
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 02:13:03PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 02:32:04AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> >> all timer callbacks, switch
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 02:32:04AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 02:32:04AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>> to pass the timer
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 04:17:32PM +0200, Kees Cook wrote:
> Sorry, I sent this and forgot that timer_setup_on_stack() is only in
> -next. If this patch is okay, I can carry it in the timers tree.
Given the fixes I called out, I am fine with your carrying it separately.
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 04:17:32PM +0200, Kees Cook wrote:
> Sorry, I sent this and forgot that timer_setup_on_stack() is only in
> -next. If this patch is okay, I can carry it in the timers tree.
Given the fixes I called out, I am fine with your carrying it separately.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 02:32:04AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 02:32:04AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
> Cc: Josh
Sorry, I sent this and forgot that timer_setup_on_stack() is only in
-next. If this patch is okay, I can carry it in the timers tree.
Thanks!
-Kees
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list
Sorry, I sent this and forgot that timer_setup_on_stack() is only in
-next. If this patch is okay, I can carry it in the timers tree.
Thanks!
-Kees
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> all timer
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Josh Triplett
Cc: Steven
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Josh Triplett
Cc: Steven Rostedt
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers
Cc: Lai Jiangshan
12 matches
Mail list logo