On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:05:43PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:39:45AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 08:21:52PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > It's only there to call rcu_user_hooks_switch(). Let's
> > > just call rcu_user_hoo
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:39:45AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 08:21:52PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > It's only there to call rcu_user_hooks_switch(). Let's
> > just call rcu_user_hooks_switch() directly, we don't need this
> > function in the middle.
>
> Hel
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 08:21:52PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> It's only there to call rcu_user_hooks_switch(). Let's
> just call rcu_user_hooks_switch() directly, we don't need this
> function in the middle.
Hello, Frederic!
Doesn't this also require an empty definition of rcu_user_hooks
It's only there to call rcu_user_hooks_switch(). Let's
just call rcu_user_hooks_switch() directly, we don't need this
function in the middle.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Josh Triplett
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h |2 ++
include/linux/sched.h|8
4 matches
Mail list logo