On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:49:24PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Josh Triplett
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I think it would actually make more sense to do this the other way
>> > around, if at all: drop
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:49:24PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:49:54PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> >> PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU serve the same function after
> >> TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
> >> has been
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:49:54PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU serve the same function after
>> TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
>> has been removed. This patch removes CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU and uses
>>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:25:34AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:49:54PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> > PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU serve the same function after
> > TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
> > has been removed. This patch removes CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU and uses
> >
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:49:54PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU serve the same function after
> TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
> has been removed. This patch removes CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU and uses
> CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU in its place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar
I think
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:49:54PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU serve the same function after
TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
has been removed. This patch removes CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU and uses
CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU in its place.
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:25:34AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:49:54PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU serve the same function after
TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
has been removed. This patch removes CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU and uses
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:49:54PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU serve the same function after
TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
has been removed. This patch removes CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU and uses
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:49:24PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:49:54PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU serve the same function after
TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
has
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:49:24PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
wrote:
I think it would actually make more sense to do this the other way
PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU serve the same function after TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
has been removed. This patch removes CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU and uses
CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU in its place.
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar
---
arch/xtensa/configs/s6105_defconfig | 2 +-
PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU serve the same function after TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
has been removed. This patch removes CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU and uses
CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU in its place.
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar bobby.pr...@gmail.com
---
arch/xtensa/configs/s6105_defconfig |
12 matches
Mail list logo