On Mon, 11 May 2015, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:51:55AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> > rcu_cpu_has_callbacks() is declared int but is actually returning bool and
> > all call-sites currently use it as bool so the declaration should be bool
> > as well.
> >
> >
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:51:55AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> rcu_cpu_has_callbacks() is declared int but is actually returning bool and
> all call-sites currently use it as bool so the declaration should be bool
> as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire
The patch seems reasonable
rcu_cpu_has_callbacks() is declared int but is actually returning bool and
all call-sites currently use it as bool so the declaration should be bool
as well.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire
---
./kernel/rcu/tree.c:3538 WARNING: return of wrong type
int != bool,
as the
rcu_cpu_has_callbacks() is declared int but is actually returning bool and
all call-sites currently use it as bool so the declaration should be bool
as well.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire hof...@osadl.org
---
./kernel/rcu/tree.c:3538 WARNING: return of wrong type
int !=
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:51:55AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
rcu_cpu_has_callbacks() is declared int but is actually returning bool and
all call-sites currently use it as bool so the declaration should be bool
as well.
Signed-off-by:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:51:55AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
rcu_cpu_has_callbacks() is declared int but is actually returning bool and
all call-sites currently use it as bool so the declaration should be bool
as well.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire hof...@osadl.org
The patch seems
6 matches
Mail list logo
