On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:28:37 +
Will Deacon wrote:
> I see you're playing "chase the patches" at the moment ;)
>
Why yes I am!
Trying to grab last minute patches from my INBOX (or they could be old
patches that I just missed), before kicking off my 12 hour test suite.
-- Steve
--
To unsubsc
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 01:26:08PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:00:28 +0800
> libin wrote:
>
> > It is a bug in nop_mcount:
> > ...
> > if (mcountsym == Elf_r_sym(relp) && !is_fake_mcount(relp)) {
> > if (make_nop) {
> > ret = make_nop((void *)ehdr
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:00:28 +0800
libin wrote:
> It is a bug in nop_mcount:
> ...
> if (mcountsym == Elf_r_sym(relp) && !is_fake_mcount(relp)) {
> if (make_nop) {
> ret = make_nop((void *)ehdr, shdr->sh_offset +
> relp->r_offset);
> }
> ...
>
> shdr->sh_offset a
在 2015/10/29 23:09, Will Deacon 写道:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:35:42PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> [auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core -- if it's inappropriate base,
>> please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
>>
>> url:
>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linu
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:35:42PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> [auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core -- if it's inappropriate base,
> please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
>
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Li-Bin/recordmcount-arm64-replace-
Hi Li,
[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core -- if it's inappropriate base,
please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Li-Bin/recordmcount-arm64-replace-the-ignored-mcount-call-into-nop/20151028-160846
config: arm64-allmod
On 10/28/2015 08:58 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:16:19AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:04:05 +0800
Li Bin wrote:
By now, the recordmcount only records the function that in
following sections:
.text/.ref.text/.sched.text/.spinlock.text/.irqentry.text/
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:16:19AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:04:05 +0800
> Li Bin wrote:
>
> > By now, the recordmcount only records the function that in
> > following sections:
> > .text/.ref.text/.sched.text/.spinlock.text/.irqentry.text/
> > .kprobes.text/.text.unli
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:04:05 +0800
Li Bin wrote:
> By now, the recordmcount only records the function that in
> following sections:
> .text/.ref.text/.sched.text/.spinlock.text/.irqentry.text/
> .kprobes.text/.text.unlikely
>
> For the function that not in these sections, the call mcount
> will
By now, the recordmcount only records the function that in
following sections:
.text/.ref.text/.sched.text/.spinlock.text/.irqentry.text/
.kprobes.text/.text.unlikely
For the function that not in these sections, the call mcount
will be in place and not be replaced when kernel boot up. And
it will
10 matches
Mail list logo
