On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 02:43:18PM +0100, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> 2014-03-18 13:02 GMT+01:00 Mark Brown :
> > + if (p) {
> > + memcpy(p + map->patch_regs, regs, num_regs * sizeof(*regs));
> > + map->patch = p;
> > + map->patch_regs += num_regs;
> > +
Hi Mark,
Just a single, mini-comment.
2014-03-18 13:02 GMT+01:00 Mark Brown :
> From: Mark Brown
>
> With fast_io we use mutexes to lock the I/O operations so we would need
> to do GFP_ATOMIC allocations if we wanted to do allocations inside the
> lock as we do currently. Since it is unlikely t
From: Mark Brown
With fast_io we use mutexes to lock the I/O operations so we would need
to do GFP_ATOMIC allocations if we wanted to do allocations inside the
lock as we do currently. Since it is unlikely that we will want to register
a patch outside of init where concurrency shouldn't be an iss
3 matches
Mail list logo