On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 08:12:04PM +0530, pramod gurav wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > A dependency from a selected symbol will have no effect.
> Thanks Mark. So essentially in this case PMIC driver should 'select SPMI'.
> Right?
I would expect it to depend on SP
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:00:54PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > No, this isn't an either/or thing - the dependency is absolutely
>> > mandatory if the device needs SPMI. The defconf
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:00:54PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > No, this isn't an either/or thing - the dependency is absolutely
> > mandatory if the device needs SPMI. The defconfigs are a separate
> > thing, they just exist to give peop
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 06:26:15PM +0530, Pramod Gurav wrote:
>
> Fix your mailer to word wrap within paragraphs, this will make your
> mails more legible - see Documentation/email-clients.txt.
>
> > On Wednesday, 16 July, 2014 5:55pm, "Stani
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 06:26:15PM +0530, Pramod Gurav wrote:
Fix your mailer to word wrap within paragraphs, this will make your
mails more legible - see Documentation/email-clients.txt.
> On Wednesday, 16 July, 2014 5:55pm, "Stanimir Varbanov"
> said:
> The CONFIG_SPMI option is visible in m
>
> Thanks.
> I misunderstood the Kconfig documentation which says, "Reverse dependencies
> can only be used with boolean or tristate symbols". In the note following
> this statement doc says, "In general use select only for non-visible symbols".
>
> The CONFIG_SPMI option is visible in menuc
Hi,
On Wednesday, 16 July, 2014 5:55pm, "Stanimir Varbanov"
said:
>
>
config REGMAP_SPMI
+ select SPMI
>>>
>>> NO, IMO the CONFIG_SPMI should be enabled by qcom_defconfig and
>>> multi_v7_defconfig. See CONFIG_I2C and REGMAP_I2C for example.
>>>
>>
>> I am using multi_v7_defc
>>>
>>> config REGMAP_SPMI
>>> + select SPMI
>>
>> NO, IMO the CONFIG_SPMI should be enabled by qcom_defconfig and
>> multi_v7_defconfig. See CONFIG_I2C and REGMAP_I2C for example.
>>
>
> I am using multi_v7_defconfig but its not enabling it. I ran qcom_defconfig
> which does.
yes, it seems
On 07/16/2014 01:39 PM, pramod.gurav@gmail.com wrote:
From: Pramod Gurav
REGMAP_SPMI module calls some functions from SPMI hence build breaks
when SPMI is not enabled while compiling REGMAP_SPMI with below linker
errors:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `regmap_spmi_ext_read':
:(.text+0x114
Hi,
On Wednesday, 16 July, 2014 5:37pm, "Stanimir Varbanov"
said:
> Hi,
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav
>> CC: Josh Cartwright
>> CC: Mark Brown
>> ---
>> This was found when I enabled support for Qualcomm QPNP PMICs and was
>> compiling it. It selects REGMAP_SPMI and hence the crash
Hi,
>
> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav
> CC: Josh Cartwright
> CC: Mark Brown
> ---
> This was found when I enabled support for Qualcomm QPNP PMICs and was
> compiling it. It selects REGMAP_SPMI and hence the crash.
>
> drivers/base/regmap/Kconfig |1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
From: Pramod Gurav
REGMAP_SPMI module calls some functions from SPMI hence build breaks
when SPMI is not enabled while compiling REGMAP_SPMI with below linker
errors:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `regmap_spmi_ext_read':
:(.text+0x1143ec): undefined reference to `spmi_ext_register_read'
:(.tex
12 matches
Mail list logo
