Re: [PATCH] regmap: irq: fix ack-invert

2018-03-03 Thread Tim Harvey
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Tim Harvey wrote: > When acking irqs we need to take into account the ack-invert case. Without > this chips that require 0's to ACK interrupts will never clear the interrupt. > > I am working on an mfd driver that will use ack-invert and discovered > this issue. Th

Re: [PATCH] regmap: irq: fix ack-invert

2018-02-28 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tim Harvey [180228 21:18]: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Tim Harvey [180227 16:07]: > >> When acking irqs we need to take into account the ack-invert case. Without > >> this chips that require 0's to ACK interrupts will never clear the > >> interrupt. > >> > >

Re: [PATCH] regmap: irq: fix ack-invert

2018-02-28 Thread Tim Harvey
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tim Harvey [180227 16:07]: >> When acking irqs we need to take into account the ack-invert case. Without >> this chips that require 0's to ACK interrupts will never clear the interrupt. >> >> I am working on an mfd driver that will use ac

Re: [PATCH] regmap: irq: fix ack-invert

2018-02-27 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tim Harvey [180227 16:07]: > When acking irqs we need to take into account the ack-invert case. Without > this chips that require 0's to ACK interrupts will never clear the interrupt. > > I am working on an mfd driver that will use ack-invert and discovered > this issue. The only user of ack_in

[PATCH] regmap: irq: fix ack-invert

2018-02-27 Thread Tim Harvey
When acking irqs we need to take into account the ack-invert case. Without this chips that require 0's to ACK interrupts will never clear the interrupt. I am working on an mfd driver that will use ack-invert and discovered this issue. The only user of ack_invert currently appears to be the motorol