Hi Andreas,
On 8 June 2017 at 16:28, Andreas Ziegler wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> I noticed your patch 'regmap: make LZO cache optional' as it recently showed
> up
> in linux-next. In your patch, you modify drivers/base/regmap/regcache.c by
> adding an #if IS_ENABLED()
Hi Jonas,
I noticed your patch 'regmap: make LZO cache optional' as it recently showed up
in linux-next. In your patch, you modify drivers/base/regmap/regcache.c by
adding an #if IS_ENABLED() statement.
However, this statement contains a spelling error, as it references
REGCHACHE_
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 03:15:37PM +0200, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> Commit 2cbbb579bcbe3 ("regmap: Add the LZO cache support") added support
> for LZO compression in regcache, but there were never any users added
> afterwards. Since LZO support itself has its own size, it currently is
> rather a deopti
Commit 2cbbb579bcbe3 ("regmap: Add the LZO cache support") added support
for LZO compression in regcache, but there were never any users added
afterwards. Since LZO support itself has its own size, it currently is
rather a deoptimization.
So make it optional by introducing a symbol that can be sel
4 matches
Mail list logo