On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 10:17 PM Rob Herring wrote:
> BTW, 'enable-active-high' is also a bit strange as that should just be
> encoded into 'enable-gpio' flags. We should really deprecate that.
I have been struggling with this (and similar flags in other subsystems)
and the current plan is to
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 10:17 PM Rob Herring wrote:
> BTW, 'enable-active-high' is also a bit strange as that should just be
> encoded into 'enable-gpio' flags. We should really deprecate that.
I have been struggling with this (and similar flags in other subsystems)
and the current plan is to
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:54 AM Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 01:32:13PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:50 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > > > Optional properties:
> > > > -- gpio: gpio to
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:54 AM Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 01:32:13PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:50 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > > > Optional properties:
> > > > -- gpio: gpio to
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 01:32:13PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:50 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > Optional properties:
> > > -- gpio: gpio to use for enable control
> > > +- gpios: gpio to use for enable
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 01:32:13PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:50 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > Optional properties:
> > > -- gpio: gpio to use for enable control
> > > +- gpios: gpio to use for enable
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:50 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > Optional properties:
> > -- gpio: gpio to use for enable control
> > +- gpios: gpio to use for enable control
>
> Are we supposed to be able to have just plain gpios as a
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:50 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > Optional properties:
> > -- gpio: gpio to use for enable control
> > +- gpios: gpio to use for enable control
>
> Are we supposed to be able to have just plain gpios as a
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Optional properties:
> -- gpio: gpio to use for enable control
> +- gpios: gpio to use for enable control
Are we supposed to be able to have just plain gpios as a standards
conforming property or would best practice be to call it
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Optional properties:
> -- gpio: gpio to use for enable control
> +- gpios: gpio to use for enable control
Are we supposed to be able to have just plain gpios as a standards
conforming property or would best practice be to call it
The fixed regulator uses "gpio" (singularis) for the GPIO line
but the standard GPIO bindings recommend "gpios" (pluralis).
We have augmented the Linux kernel to handle both, so recommend
the best practice and deprecate the singularis variant.
Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Leonard Crestez
The fixed regulator uses "gpio" (singularis) for the GPIO line
but the standard GPIO bindings recommend "gpios" (pluralis).
We have augmented the Linux kernel to handle both, so recommend
the best practice and deprecate the singularis variant.
Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Leonard Crestez
12 matches
Mail list logo
