2014-09-10 17:23 GMT+08:00 Guodong Xu :
>
>
> On 09/10/2014 12:23 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
>> 2014-09-10 12:20 GMT+08:00 Axel Lin :
>>> 2014-09-10 11:50 GMT+08:00 Guodong Xu :
These of_node_get() were added to balance refcount decrements inside of
of_find_node_by_name().
See: commit c92f5
On 09/10/2014 12:23 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
> 2014-09-10 12:20 GMT+08:00 Axel Lin :
>> 2014-09-10 11:50 GMT+08:00 Guodong Xu :
>>> These of_node_get() were added to balance refcount decrements inside of
>>> of_find_node_by_name().
>>> See: commit c92f5dd2c42f ("regulator: Add missing of_node_put()")
2014-09-10 12:20 GMT+08:00 Axel Lin :
> 2014-09-10 11:50 GMT+08:00 Guodong Xu :
>> These of_node_get() were added to balance refcount decrements inside of
>> of_find_node_by_name().
>> See: commit c92f5dd2c42f ("regulator: Add missing of_node_put()")
>>
>> However of_find_node_by_name() was then re
2014-09-10 11:50 GMT+08:00 Guodong Xu :
> These of_node_get() were added to balance refcount decrements inside of
> of_find_node_by_name().
> See: commit c92f5dd2c42f ("regulator: Add missing of_node_put()")
>
> However of_find_node_by_name() was then replaced by of_get_child_by_name(),
> which doe
These of_node_get() were added to balance refcount decrements inside of
of_find_node_by_name().
See: commit c92f5dd2c42f ("regulator: Add missing of_node_put()")
However of_find_node_by_name() was then replaced by of_get_child_by_name(),
which doesn't call of_node_put() against its input parameter
5 matches
Mail list logo