Hi Stephan,
Thank you for your reply.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/01/2013 08:59 AM, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Thank you for your reply.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:41:04AM +0530, Manish B
On 10/01/2013 08:59 AM, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:41:04AM +0530, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
>>> This patch changes the driver to avoid the usage of IS_ERR_OR_NULL()
>>> macro.
>>
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your reply.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:41:04AM +0530, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
>> This patch changes the driver to avoid the usage of IS_ERR_OR_NULL()
>> macro.
>
> Why?
Code use "IS_ERR_OR_NULL()" properly as per current
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:41:04AM +0530, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
> This patch changes the driver to avoid the usage of IS_ERR_OR_NULL()
> macro.
Why?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
This patch changes the driver to avoid the usage of IS_ERR_OR_NULL()
macro.
The case present in this patch simply translates to normal check for pointer,
wheather it is NULL or has an error code.
Signed-off-by: Manish Badarkhe
---
:100644 100644 bd611cdf.. ad3d4d4... M drivers/regulator/tps6509
5 matches
Mail list logo