Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: da8xx: don't select CMA on no-MMU

2014-05-12 Thread Ohad Ben-Cohen
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I'd prefer if you could pick it up into your tree. Sure thing. Thanks, Ohad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vge

Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: da8xx: don't select CMA on no-MMU

2014-05-12 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 12 May 2014 16:09:56 Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > We can only use CMA on systems that have an MMU, because of > > the requirement to use memory migration. NOMMU systems are > > rather constrained to start with, but it seems reasonabl

Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: da8xx: don't select CMA on no-MMU

2014-05-12 Thread Ohad Ben-Cohen
Hi Arnd, On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > We can only use CMA on systems that have an MMU, because of > the requirement to use memory migration. NOMMU systems are > rather constrained to start with, but it seems reasonable > to assume that DMA allocations can still succeed i

[PATCH] remoteproc: da8xx: don't select CMA on no-MMU

2014-05-08 Thread Arnd Bergmann
We can only use CMA on systems that have an MMU, because of the requirement to use memory migration. NOMMU systems are rather constrained to start with, but it seems reasonable to assume that DMA allocations can still succeed in the constrained case for remoteproc on NOMMU, so this patch changes th