[PATCH] riscv: patch: remove lockdep assertion on lock text_mutex

2021-04-16 Thread Changbin Du
The function patch_insn_write() expects that the text_mutex is already held. There's a case that text_mutex is acquired by ftrace_run_update_code() under syscall context but then patch_insn_write() will be executed under the migration kthread context as we involves stop machine. So we should remove

[PATCH] Remove BCM2835 SPI chipselect limit.

2021-04-14 Thread Joe Burmeister
The limit of 4 chipselects for the BCM2835 was not required and also was not inforced. Without inforcement it was possible to make a device tree over this limit which would trample memory. The chipselect count is now obtained from the device tree and expanded if more devices are added. Signed-off

Re: [PATCH] Remove the GOLDFISH dependency from BATTERY_GOLDFISH

2021-04-05 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi, On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:22:26AM -0800, Roman Kiryanov wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:31 PM wrote: > > > > From: Roman Kiryanov > > > > This will allow to use the BATTERY_GOLDFISH driver > > without enabling GOLDFISH. > > Hi Sebastian, could you please take a look at my patch? > > Tha

[PATCH] remove Dan Murphy from TI from MAINTAINERS

2021-03-26 Thread Pavel Machek
Dan's address bounces, and has been bouncing for some time as he moved to other projects. I believe TI should be more careful with this, and should assign alternate contacts for their drivers. Anyway what we can do now is to remove the obsolete address. Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek --- (I'm s

Re: [PATCH] Remove the GOLDFISH dependency from BATTERY_GOLDFISH

2021-03-09 Thread Roman Kiryanov
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:31 PM wrote: > > From: Roman Kiryanov > > This will allow to use the BATTERY_GOLDFISH driver > without enabling GOLDFISH. Hi Sebastian, could you please take a look at my patch? Thank you.

Re: [PATCH] remove unused variable driver_desc

2021-02-16 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:59:51PM -0500, Sean Behan wrote: > --- > drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c > b/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c > index 3536c03ff523..741147a4f0fe 100644 > --- a/drivers/st

[PATCH] remove unused variable driver_desc

2021-02-16 Thread Sean Behan
--- drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c b/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c index 3536c03ff523..741147a4f0fe 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c +++ b/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c @@ -38,7

[PATCH] Remove the GOLDFISH dependency from BATTERY_GOLDFISH

2021-02-05 Thread rkir
From: Roman Kiryanov This will allow to use the BATTERY_GOLDFISH driver without enabling GOLDFISH. Signed-off-by: Roman Kiryanov --- drivers/power/supply/Kconfig | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/Kconfig b/drivers/power/supply/Kconfi

Re: [RFC PATCH] Remove redundant sched_numa_balancing check.

2021-01-18 Thread Imran Khan
On 18/1/21 9:57 pm, Mel Gorman wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:32:18PM +1100, Imran Khan wrote: task_numa_fault is invoked from do_numa_page/do_huge_pmd_numa_page, for task_numa_work induced memory faults. task_numa_work is scheduled from task_tick_numa which is invoked only if sched_numa_b

Re: [RFC PATCH] Remove redundant sched_numa_balancing check.

2021-01-18 Thread Mel Gorman
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:32:18PM +1100, Imran Khan wrote: > task_numa_fault is invoked from do_numa_page/do_huge_pmd_numa_page, > for task_numa_work induced memory faults. task_numa_work is scheduled > from task_tick_numa which is invoked only if sched_numa_balancing > is true. > > So task_numa_

[RFC PATCH] Remove redundant sched_numa_balancing check.

2021-01-18 Thread Imran Khan
task_numa_fault is invoked from do_numa_page/do_huge_pmd_numa_page, for task_numa_work induced memory faults. task_numa_work is scheduled from task_tick_numa which is invoked only if sched_numa_balancing is true. So task_numa_fault will not get invoked if sched_numa_balancing is false and hence we

Re: [PATCH] Remove $(cc-option,-gdwarf-4) dependency from CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF4

2020-12-02 Thread Nick Desaulniers
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 7:42 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 12:29 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > The -gdwarf-4 flag is supported by GCC 4.5+, and also by Clang. > > > > You can see it at https://godbolt.org/z/6ed1oW (this link misses -gdwarf-4 for clang, but I think that

Re: [PATCH] Remove $(cc-option,-gdwarf-4) dependency from CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF4

2020-11-30 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 12:29 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > The -gdwarf-4 flag is supported by GCC 4.5+, and also by Clang. > > You can see it at https://godbolt.org/z/6ed1oW > > For gcc 4.5.3 pane,line 37:.value 0x4 > For clang 10.0.1 pane, line 117: .short 4 > > Given Documentation/

[PATCH] Remove $(cc-option,-gdwarf-4) dependency from CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF4

2020-11-30 Thread Masahiro Yamada
The -gdwarf-4 flag is supported by GCC 4.5+, and also by Clang. You can see it at https://godbolt.org/z/6ed1oW For gcc 4.5.3 pane,line 37:.value 0x4 For clang 10.0.1 pane, line 117: .short 4 Given Documentation/process/changes.rst stating GCC 4.9 is the minimal version, this cc-opt

[PATCH] Remove unnecessary invoking of wbt_update_limits in wbt_init

2020-11-13 Thread chenlei0x
From: Lei Chen It's unnecessary to call wbt_update_limits explicitly within wbt_init, because it will be called in the following function wbt_queue_depth_changed. Signed-off-by: Lei Chen --- block/blk-wbt.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.c b/block/blk-wbt.c in

Re: [PATCH] Remove duplicate include file

2020-09-09 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 05:36:32PM +0800, Yi Li wrote: > Remove duplicate include file > > Signed-off-by: Yi Li Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport > --- > arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 1 - > mm/slab.h | 1 - > 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c > in

[PATCH] Remove duplicate include file

2020-09-09 Thread Yi Li
Remove duplicate include file Signed-off-by: Yi Li --- arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 1 - mm/slab.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c index c36f977b2ccb..7bbcdb29413e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@

Re: [PATCH] Remove unused variables

2020-09-03 Thread Anant Thazhemadam
This patch was generated, and sent by a script I was working on (and apparently, still am), that would run sparse, detect unused variables and eliminate them. However, upon manual inspection, it became clear to me that these functions are in fact necessary. I'm sorry this mistake happened. Kindly i

[PATCH] Remove unused variables

2020-09-03 Thread Anant Thazhemadam
A few unused variables that were defined were found and removed. Signed-off-by: Anant Thazhemadam --- drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/dt2814.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/dt2814.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/dt2814.c index bcf4d5444faf

Re: [PATCH] Remove ipvs v6 dependency on iptables

2020-08-29 Thread Julian Anastasov
Hello, On Sat, 29 Aug 2020, Yaroslav Bolyukin wrote: > This dependency was added as part of commit ecefa32ffda201975 > ("ipvs: Fix faulty IPv6 extension header handling in IPVS"), because it > had dependency on ipv6_find_hdr, which was located in iptables-specific > code > > But it is

[PATCH] Remove ipvs v6 dependency on iptables

2020-08-29 Thread Yaroslav Bolyukin
This dependency was added as part of commit ecefa32ffda201975 ("ipvs: Fix faulty IPv6 extension header handling in IPVS"), because it had dependency on ipv6_find_hdr, which was located in iptables-specific code But it is no longer required after commit e6f890cfde0e74d5b ("ipv6:Move ipv6_find_hdr()

Re: [PATCH] Remove ipvs v6 dependency on iptables

2020-08-28 Thread Nicolas Dichtel
Le 28/08/2020 à 00:07, Lach a écrit : > This dependency was added in 63dca2c0b0e7a92cb39d1b1ecefa32ffda201975, > because this commit had dependency on > ipv6_find_hdr, which was located in iptables-specific code > > But it is no longer required, because > f8f626754ebeca613cf1af2e6f890cfde0e74d5b

Re: [PATCH] Remove unneeded variable t1

2020-08-27 Thread Herbert Xu
Xu Wang wrote: > Remove unneeded variable t1 seed_encrypt() and > seed_decrypt(). > > Signed-off-by: Xu Wang > --- > crypto/seed.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/crypto/seed.c b/crypto/seed.c > index 5e3bef3a617d..69b3058d6a32 100644 > --- a/crypto/s

[PATCH] Remove ipvs v6 dependency on iptables

2020-08-27 Thread Lach
This dependency was added in 63dca2c0b0e7a92cb39d1b1ecefa32ffda201975, because this commit had dependency on ipv6_find_hdr, which was located in iptables-specific code But it is no longer required, because f8f626754ebeca613cf1af2e6f890cfde0e74d5b moved them to a more common location --- include

Re: [PATCH] Remove ipvs v6 dependency on iptables

2020-08-27 Thread Julian Anastasov
Hello, On Fri, 28 Aug 2020, Lach wrote: > This dependency was added in 63dca2c0b0e7a92cb39d1b1ecefa32ffda201975, > because this commit had dependency on > ipv6_find_hdr, which was located in iptables-specific code > > But it is no longer required, because > f8f626754ebeca613cf1af2e6f

[PATCH] Remove ipvs v6 dependency on iptables

2020-08-27 Thread Lach
This dependency was added in 63dca2c0b0e7a92cb39d1b1ecefa32ffda201975, because this commit had dependency on ipv6_find_hdr, which was located in iptables-specific code But it is no longer required, because f8f626754ebeca613cf1af2e6f890cfde0e74d5b moved them to a more common location --- net/net

Re: [PATCH] remove comment about sparse not supporting __has_attribute

2020-08-27 Thread Miguel Ojeda
Hi Luc, On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 1:25 AM Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > > Sparse supports __has_attribute() since 2018-08-31, so the comment > is not true anymore but more importantly is rather confusing. > > So remove it. > > Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck Thanks! Queuing it. Cheers, Miguel

[PATCH] remove comment about sparse not supporting __has_attribute

2020-08-24 Thread Luc Van Oostenryck
Sparse supports __has_attribute() since 2018-08-31, so the comment is not true anymore but more importantly is rather confusing. So remove it. Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck --- include/linux/compiler_attributes.h | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/compile

[PATCH] Remove unneeded variable t1

2020-08-18 Thread Xu Wang
Remove unneeded variable t1 seed_encrypt() and seed_decrypt(). Signed-off-by: Xu Wang --- crypto/seed.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/crypto/seed.c b/crypto/seed.c index 5e3bef3a617d..69b3058d6a32 100644 --- a/crypto/seed.c +++ b/crypto/seed.c @@ -366,7

Re: [PATCH] Remove attempt by intel-spi-pci to turn the SPI flash chip writeable

2020-08-04 Thread Mika Westerberg
Hi, On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 10:44:49AM -0300, Daniel Gutson wrote: > Currently, the intel-spi-pci driver tries to unconditionally set > the SPI chip writeable. After discussing in the LKML, the original > author decided that it was better to remove the attempt. > > Context, the intel-spi has a m

Re: [PATCH] Remove attempt by intel-spi-pci to turn the SPI flash chip writeable

2020-08-03 Thread Daniel Gutson
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:55 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:45 PM Daniel Gutson > wrote: > > > However, this flag applies only for a number of devices, coming from the > > platform driver, whereas the devices detected through the PCI driver > > (intel-spi-pci) are not subjec

Re: [PATCH] Remove attempt by intel-spi-pci to turn the SPI flash chip writeable

2020-08-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:45 PM Daniel Gutson wrote: > However, this flag applies only for a number of devices, coming from the > platform driver, whereas the devices detected through the PCI driver > (intel-spi-pci) are not subject to this check since the configuration > takes place in intel-spi-

[PATCH] Remove attempt by intel-spi-pci to turn the SPI flash chip writeable

2020-08-03 Thread Daniel Gutson
Currently, the intel-spi-pci driver tries to unconditionally set the SPI chip writeable. After discussing in the LKML, the original author decided that it was better to remove the attempt. Context, the intel-spi has a module argument that controls whether the driver attempts to turn the SPI flash

Re: [PATCH] Remove __init from padata_do_multithreaded and padata_mt_helper

2020-07-02 Thread kernel test robot
Hi Nico, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on linux/master] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.8-rc3 next-20200702] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as docum

[PATCH] Remove __init from padata_do_multithreaded and padata_mt_helper

2020-07-01 Thread Nico Pache
Allow padata_do_multithreaded function to be called after bootstrap. Signed-off-by: Nico Pache --- include/linux/padata.h | 2 +- kernel/padata.c| 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/padata.h b/include/linux/padata.h index 7302efff5..2e7

Re: [PATCH] Remove handhelds.org links and email addresses

2020-06-29 Thread Alexander A. Klimov
Am 29.06.20 um 23:10 schrieb Wolfram Sang: Hi Alexander, thanks for trying to fix this, yet I have some doubts. On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:31:21PM +0200, Alexander A. Klimov wrote: Rationale: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20200626110706.7b5d4...@lwn.net/ I think we need some text here

Re: [PATCH] Remove handhelds.org links and email addresses

2020-06-29 Thread Wolfram Sang
Hi Alexander, thanks for trying to fix this, yet I have some doubts. On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:31:21PM +0200, Alexander A. Klimov wrote: > Rationale: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20200626110706.7b5d4...@lwn.net/ I think we need some text here. Clicking on a link to understand what a patc

Re: [PATCH] Remove handhelds.org links and email addresses

2020-06-29 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:31:21PM +0200, Alexander A. Klimov wrote: > Rationale: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20200626110706.7b5d4...@lwn.net/ > > Signed-off-by: Alexander A. Klimov > --- > @Jon I thought about what I said and *no*, unfortunately I *can't* automate > the detection of su

[PATCH] Remove handhelds.org links and email addresses

2020-06-29 Thread Alexander A. Klimov
Rationale: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20200626110706.7b5d4...@lwn.net/ Signed-off-by: Alexander A. Klimov --- @Jon I thought about what I said and *no*, unfortunately I *can't* automate the detection of such as easy as the HTTPSifying. As you maybe see below cleaning up is even "harder"

Re: [PATCH] Remove drm_display_mode.hsync

2020-04-28 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:18:13PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:05:17AM +0200, Michal Orzel wrote: > > As suggested by the TODO list of DRM subsystem: > > -remove the member hsync of drm_display_mode > > -convert code using hsync member to use drm_mode_hsync() > > > > S

Re: [PATCH] Remove drm_display_mode.hsync

2020-04-28 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:05:17AM +0200, Michal Orzel wrote: > As suggested by the TODO list of DRM subsystem: > -remove the member hsync of drm_display_mode > -convert code using hsync member to use drm_mode_hsync() > > Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel I think Ville has a bunch of patches doing thi

Re: [PATCH] Remove GP_REPLAY state from rcu_sync

2019-10-07 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 10/04, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 05:41:03PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 10/04, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote: > > > > > > Taking a step back, why did we intend to have > > > to wait for a new GP if another rcu_sync_exit() comes while one is still > > > in progress?

Re: [PATCH] Remove GP_REPLAY state from rcu_sync

2019-10-04 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi "Joel, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on rcu/dev] [cannot apply to v5.4-rc1 next-20191004] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the ba

Re: [PATCH] Remove GP_REPLAY state from rcu_sync

2019-10-04 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi "Joel, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on rcu/dev] [cannot apply to v5.4-rc1 next-20191004] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the base tre

Re: [PATCH] Remove GP_REPLAY state from rcu_sync

2019-10-04 Thread Joel Fernandes
Hi Oleg, On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 05:41:03PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 10/04, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote: > > > > But this is not always true if you consider the following events: > > I'm afraid I missed your point, but... > > > --> > > GP num 11

Re: [PATCH] Remove GP_REPLAY state from rcu_sync

2019-10-04 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 10/04, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote: > > But this is not always true if you consider the following events: I'm afraid I missed your point, but... > --> > GP num 11 2 > GP state ie px r

Re: [PATCH] Remove GP_REPLAY state from rcu_sync

2019-10-04 Thread Joel Fernandes
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 10:57:41AM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote: > From: Joel Fernandes > > Please consider this is an RFC for discussion only. Just want to discuss > why the GP_REPLAY state is needed at all. And I messed up the subject prefix, but this is *really* RFC and for discussion

[PATCH] Remove GP_REPLAY state from rcu_sync

2019-10-04 Thread Joel Fernandes (Google)
From: Joel Fernandes Please consider this is an RFC for discussion only. Just want to discuss why the GP_REPLAY state is needed at all. Here's the intention AFAICS: When rcu_sync_exit() has happened, the gp_state changes to GP_EXIT while we wait for a grace period before transitioning to GP_IDLE

[PATCH] remove the acheive sp error

2019-09-03 Thread Marcus Eagan
From: marcussorealheis --- drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c | 2 +- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c | 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions

[PATCH] Remove include/linux/ipmi-fru.h and include/linux/sdb.h

2019-08-13 Thread minyard
From: Corey Minyard These files were added as part of the FMC subsystem, but were not removed when the FMC subsystem was removed in 6a80b30086 "fmc: Delete the FMC subsystem". They have no users, so remove them. Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard Cc: Linus Walleij Cc: Pat Riehecky Cc: Alessandro R

Re: [PATCH] remove the initrd resource in /proc/iomem as theinitrdhas freed the reserved memblock.

2019-07-05 Thread James Morse
Hi, (CC: +devicetree list: memreserving the initrd, which linux then frees causes a zombie memreserve in all future kexec'd kernels) On 03/07/2019 12:42, huang.jun...@zte.com.cn wrote: On 02/07/2019 11:34, Yi Wang wrote: > From: Junhua Huang > The 'commit 50d7ba36b916 ("arm64: expo

Re: [PATCH] remove the initrd resource in /proc/iomem as the initrdhas freed the reserved memblock.

2019-07-03 Thread James Morse
Hi, On 03/07/2019 10:16, huang.jun...@zte.com.cn wrote: >> On 02/07/2019 11:34, Yi Wang wrote: >>> From: Junhua Huang >>> The 'commit 50d7ba36b916 ("arm64: export memblock_reserve()d regions via >>> /proc/iomem")' >>> show the reserved memblock in /proc/iomem. But the initrd's reserved >>> memb

Re: [PATCH] remove the initrd resource in /proc/iomem as the initrd has freed the reserved memblock.

2019-07-02 Thread James Morse
Hello, On 02/07/2019 11:34, Yi Wang wrote: > From: Junhua Huang > > The 'commit 50d7ba36b916 ("arm64: export memblock_reserve()d regions via > /proc/iomem")' > show the reserved memblock in /proc/iomem. But the initrd's reserved memblock > will be freed in free_initrd_mem(), which executes afte

[PATCH] remove the initrd resource in /proc/iomem as the initrd has freed the reserved memblock.

2019-07-02 Thread Yi Wang
From: Junhua Huang The 'commit 50d7ba36b916 ("arm64: export memblock_reserve()d regions via /proc/iomem")' show the reserved memblock in /proc/iomem. But the initrd's reserved memblock will be freed in free_initrd_mem(), which executes after the reserve_memblock_reserved_regions(). So there are

Re: [PATCH] Remove myself as qcom maintainer

2019-06-12 Thread Andy Gross
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:12 AM David Brown wrote: > > I no longer regularly work on this platform, and only have a few > increasingly outdated boards. Andy has primarily been doing the > maintenance. > > Signed-off-by: David Brown > --- > Resending this, hopefully with text=flowed not set in t

Re: [PATCH] Remove myself as qcom maintainer

2019-06-12 Thread David Brown
I no longer regularly work on this platform, and only have a few increasingly outdated boards. Andy has primarily been doing the maintenance. Signed-off-by: David Brown --- Resending this, hopefully with text=flowed not set in the email headers. MAINTAINERS | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Re: [PATCH] Remove myself as qcom maintainer

2019-06-12 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 09:54:11AM -0600, David Brown wrote: > I no longer regularly work on this platform, and only have a few > increasingly outdated boards. Andy has primarily been doing the > maintenance. > > Signed-off-by: David Brown > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-

[PATCH] Remove myself as qcom maintainer

2019-06-12 Thread David Brown
I no longer regularly work on this platform, and only have a few increasingly outdated boards. Andy has primarily been doing the maintenance. Signed-off-by: David Brown --- MAINTAINERS | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 57f496cff999..27df8f46a283 1

Re: [PATCH] Remove MODULE_ALIAS() calls that take undefined macro

2019-05-08 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 07 May 2019, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > These files do not define (USBHS_)DRIVER_NAME. Yet, they can be > successfully compiled because they are never built as a module by > anyone, i.e, the MODULE_ALIAS() calls are always no-op. > > A problem showed up when a patch "moduleparam: Save infor

Re: [PATCH] Remove MODULE_ALIAS() calls that take undefined macro

2019-05-06 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Daniel Lezcano [190506 17:40]: > On 06/05/2019 19:28, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > These files do not define (USBHS_)DRIVER_NAME. Yet, they can be > > successfully compiled because they are never built as a module by > > anyone, i.e, the MODULE_ALIAS() calls are always no-op. > > > > A problem sh

Re: [PATCH] Remove MODULE_ALIAS() calls that take undefined macro

2019-05-06 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/05/2019 19:28, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > These files do not define (USBHS_)DRIVER_NAME. Yet, they can be > successfully compiled because they are never built as a module by > anyone, i.e, the MODULE_ALIAS() calls are always no-op. > > A problem showed up when a patch "moduleparam: Save inform

[PATCH] Remove MODULE_ALIAS() calls that take undefined macro

2019-05-06 Thread Masahiro Yamada
These files do not define (USBHS_)DRIVER_NAME. Yet, they can be successfully compiled because they are never built as a module by anyone, i.e, the MODULE_ALIAS() calls are always no-op. A problem showed up when a patch "moduleparam: Save information about built-in modules in separate file" is appl

Re: [PATCH] Remove SPDX "WITH Linux-syscall-note" from kernel-space headers

2019-03-29 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 1:54 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > The "WITH Linux-syscall-note" should be added to headers exported to > the user-space. > > Some kernel-space headers have "WITH Linux-syscall-note", which seems > a mistake. > > [1] arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h > > 5a4858032217 ("x86

[PATCH] Remove SPDX "WITH Linux-syscall-note" from kernel-space headers

2019-03-29 Thread Masahiro Yamada
The "WITH Linux-syscall-note" should be added to headers exported to the user-space. Some kernel-space headers have "WITH Linux-syscall-note", which seems a mistake. [1] arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h 5a4858032217 ("x86/hyper-v: move hyperv.h out of uapi") moved this file out of uapi, but mi

Re: [PATCH] Remove deductively redundant NULL pointer checks

2019-03-03 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 17:43 -0700, Shaobo He wrote: > The fixes included in this commit essentially removes NULL pointer > checks on the return values of function `get_queue_ctx` as well as > `v4l2_m2m_get_vq` defined in file v4l2-mem2mem.c. > > Function `get_queue_ctx` is very unlikely to return

[PATCH] Remove deductively redundant NULL pointer checks

2019-02-26 Thread Shaobo He
The fixes included in this commit essentially removes NULL pointer checks on the return values of function `get_queue_ctx` as well as `v4l2_m2m_get_vq` defined in file v4l2-mem2mem.c. Function `get_queue_ctx` is very unlikely to return a NULL pointer because its return value is an address composed

Re: [PATCH] Remove deductively redundant NULL pointer checks

2019-02-26 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Shaobo, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on linuxtv-media/master] [also build test WARNING on v5.0-rc8 next-20190225] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/

Re: [PATCH] Remove deductively redundant NULL pointer checks

2019-02-26 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Shaobo, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on linuxtv-media/master] [also build test WARNING on v5.0-rc8 next-20190225] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/

[PATCH] Remove deductively redundant NULL pointer checks

2019-02-25 Thread Shaobo He
The fixes included in this commit essentially removes NULL pointer checks on the return values of function `get_queue_ctx` as well as `v4l2_m2m_get_vq` defined in file v4l2-mem2mem.c. Function `get_queue_ctx` is very unlikely to return a NULL pointer because its return value is an address composed

Re: [PATCH] remove unused end_pfn

2019-02-08 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 02:04:38PM +, Tom Murphy wrote: > This variable is useless. > > --- > drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) A similar change is already in the iommu tree[1]. Joerg [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel

[PATCH] remove unused end_pfn

2019-02-08 Thread Tom Murphy
This variable is useless. --- drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c index 8e04b0603a4a..eff301d5e496 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c @@ -291,7 +29

[PATCH] remove redundant queue structure for Mediatek Command-Queue DMA controller

2019-01-24 Thread shun-chih.yu
This patchset introduces support for MediaTek Command-Queue DMA controller in dt-bindings, and simplifies the controller by removing redundant structures. Main changes to the initial version: - remove redundant queue structure in mtk_cqdma_pchan - remove redundant completion management - remove r

Re: [PATCH] Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() function

2019-01-04 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 10:03:42AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 9:42 AM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > ... and this is just the very first build I happened to try this morning. > > It will fail for all sparc32 builds. And unlike the powerpc case, I > hadn't even noticed thi

Re: [PATCH] Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() function

2019-01-04 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 9:42 AM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > ... and this is just the very first build I happened to try this morning. It will fail for all sparc32 builds. And unlike the powerpc case, I hadn't even noticed this one. Trivial fix for powerpc/sparc32 pushed out. Hopefully that was all o

Re: [PATCH] Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() function

2019-01-04 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 1:28 AM Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > Revert commit 05a4ab823983 ("powerpc/uaccess: fix warning/error with > access_ok()") to fix the following compilation error: Gaah. I even *looked* at the powerpc use of 'type', but then when I was actually going through my manual editing

Re: [PATCH] Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() function

2019-01-04 Thread LEROY Christophe
Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : In commit 05a4ab823983 ("powerpc/uaccess: fix warning/error with access_ok()") an attempt was made to remove a warning by referencing the variable `type`, however in commit 96d4f267e40f ("Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() function") the variable `type` has been

[PATCH] Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() function

2019-01-04 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
In commit 05a4ab823983 ("powerpc/uaccess: fix warning/error with access_ok()") an attempt was made to remove a warning by referencing the variable `type`, however in commit 96d4f267e40f ("Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() function") the variable `type` has been removed. Revert commit 05a4ab8

Re: [PATCH] remove old GCC version implementation

2018-11-26 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:15 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > GCC 4.6 is the minimum supported now. > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre > --- > scripts/mod/file2alias.c | 6 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c b/scripts/mod/file2alia

Re: [PATCH] remove old GCC version implementation

2018-11-17 Thread Miguel Ojeda
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 5:14 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 8:28 PM Miguel Ojeda > wrote: > > > > By the way, is it possible that scripts/ and similar stuff uses > > directly include/linux/compiler_attributes.h (whenever it hits > > mainline, see > > https://github.com/oje

Re: [PATCH] remove old GCC version implementation

2018-10-31 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 8:28 PM Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:18 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > > > GCC 4.6 is the minimum supported now. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre > > --- > > scripts/mod/file2alias.c | 6 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletio

Re: [PATCH] remove old GCC version implementation

2018-10-31 Thread Miguel Ojeda
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:18 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > GCC 4.6 is the minimum supported now. > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre > --- > scripts/mod/file2alias.c | 6 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c b/scripts/mod/file2alia

[PATCH] remove old GCC version implementation

2018-10-31 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
GCC 4.6 is the minimum supported now. Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre --- scripts/mod/file2alias.c | 6 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c index 28a61665bb9c..4b59564d4706 100644 --- a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c

Re: [PATCH] Remove duplicated entry for westmereep-dp in mapfile.csv

2018-05-04 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Thu, May 03, 2018 at 03:50:32PM -0400, William Cohen escreveu: > Signed-off-by: William Cohen > --- > tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/mapfile.csv | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) Thanks, applied. - Arnaldo > diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/mapfile.csv > b/tools/perf/pmu-e

[PATCH] Remove duplicated entry for westmereep-dp in mapfile.csv

2018-05-03 Thread William Cohen
Signed-off-by: William Cohen --- tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/mapfile.csv | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/mapfile.csv b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/mapfile.csv index 93656f2fd53a..7e3cce3bcf3b 100644 --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/mapf

Re: [PATCH] remove raw pointer from printk message

2018-02-03 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 01:48:19PM +0800, 540263...@qq.com wrote: > From: qize wang <540263...@qq.com> > > The set_real_mode_mem function always print a raw kernel pointer to the > kernel log > at every boot. So just remove raw pointer from printk message. > > Reported-by: qize wang > Cc: stabl

Re: [PATCH] Remove silentoldconfig from "make help"; fix kconfig/conf's help

2018-01-27 Thread Masahiro Yamada
2018-01-27 8:00 GMT+09:00 Marc Herbert : > Masahiro, > > On 17/01/2018 20:31, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >> Sorry for my late reply. > > I think we're even now :-) > >>> I'd like to keep that sentence because it's there to explain the legacy and >>> confusing "--silentoldconfig" name which unfortunat

Re: [PATCH] Remove silentoldconfig from "make help"; fix kconfig/conf's help

2018-01-26 Thread Marc Herbert
Masahiro, On 17/01/2018 20:31, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Sorry for my late reply. I think we're even now :-) >> I'd like to keep that sentence because it's there to explain the legacy and >> confusing "--silentoldconfig" name which unfortunately still sticks out in >> the *current* conf.c inter

Re: [PATCH] Remove silentoldconfig from "make help"; fix kconfig/conf's help

2018-01-17 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Marc, Sorry for my late reply. 2018-01-13 7:49 GMT+09:00 Marc Herbert : > Masahiro, > > On 09/01/2018 23:17, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >> > "(oldconfig used to be more verbose)" > >>The historical background is git. >>If people are interested in archeology, >>they would be able t

Re: [PATCH] Remove structure passing and assignment to save stack and no coping structures.

2018-01-15 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Karim, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] [also build test WARNING on v4.15-rc8 next-20180115] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/

[PATCH] Remove structure passing and assignment to save stack and no coping structures.

2018-01-13 Thread Karim Eshapa
Signed-off-by: Karim Eshapa Thanks, Karim --- include/linux/tnum.h | 2 +- kernel/bpf/tnum.c | 13 +++-- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/tnum.h b/include/linux/tnum.h index 0d2d3da..ddb1250 1006

[PATCH] Remove structure passing and assignment to save stack and no coping structures.

2018-01-13 Thread Karim Eshapa
Signed-off-by: Karim Eshapa Thanks, Karim --- include/linux/tnum.h | 2 +- kernel/bpf/tnum.c | 13 +++-- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/tnum.h b/include/linux/tnum.h index 0d2d3da..ddb1250 1006

Re: [PATCH] Remove silentoldconfig from "make help"; fix kconfig/conf's help

2018-01-12 Thread Marc Herbert
Masahiro, On 09/01/2018 23:17, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > "(oldconfig used to be more verbose)" >The historical background is git. >If people are interested in archeology, >they would be able to do it by "git log", "git blame", etc. >We are generally interested in the current

Re: [PATCH] Remove silentoldconfig from "make help"; fix kconfig/conf's help

2018-01-09 Thread Masahiro Yamada
2018-01-06 7:21 GMT+09:00 Marc Herbert : > On 04/01/2018 09:21, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> (+CC Michal's new address) >> >> 2017-12-19 10:26 GMT+09:00 Marc Herbert : >>> As explained by Michal Marek at https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/31/189 >>> silentoldconfig has become a misnomer. It has become an in

Re: [PATCH] Remove silentoldconfig from "make help"; fix kconfig/conf's help

2018-01-05 Thread Marc Herbert
On 04/01/2018 09:21, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > (+CC Michal's new address) > > 2017-12-19 10:26 GMT+09:00 Marc Herbert : >> As explained by Michal Marek at https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/31/189 >> silentoldconfig has become a misnomer. It has become an internal >> interface and "oldconfig" is just as

Re: [PATCH] Remove silentoldconfig from "make help"; fix kconfig/conf's help

2018-01-04 Thread Masahiro Yamada
(+CC Michal's new address) 2017-12-19 10:26 GMT+09:00 Marc Herbert : > As explained by Michal Marek at https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/31/189 > silentoldconfig has become a misnomer. It has become an internal > interface and "oldconfig" is just as silent now. Hmm, I'd like to be sure about your int

[PATCH] Remove silentoldconfig from "make help"; fix kconfig/conf's help

2017-12-18 Thread Marc Herbert
As explained by Michal Marek at https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/31/189 silentoldconfig has become a misnomer. It has become an internal interface and "oldconfig" is just as silent now. It's not part of the user interface so remove it from "make help" to stop confusing people trying to use it as seen f

Re: [PATCH] Remove explicit return type cast

2017-08-08 Thread hari prasath
On 3 August 2017 at 18:53, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 06:23:54PM +0530, hari prasath wrote: >> On 3 August 2017 at 11:52, kbuild test robot wrote: >> > Hi Hari, >> > >> > [auto build test WARNING on staging/staging-testing] >> > [also build test WARNING on next-20170802] >> >

Re: [PATCH] Remove explicit return type cast

2017-08-03 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 06:23:54PM +0530, hari prasath wrote: > On 3 August 2017 at 11:52, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi Hari, > > > > [auto build test WARNING on staging/staging-testing] > > [also build test WARNING on next-20170802] > > [cannot apply to v4.13-rc3] > > [if your patch is applied

Re: [PATCH] Remove explicit return type cast

2017-08-03 Thread hari prasath
On 3 August 2017 at 11:52, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Hari, > > [auto build test WARNING on staging/staging-testing] > [also build test WARNING on next-20170802] > [cannot apply to v4.13-rc3] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to > help improve the system]

Re: [PATCH] Remove explicit return type cast

2017-08-02 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Hari, [auto build test WARNING on staging/staging-testing] [also build test WARNING on next-20170802] [cannot apply to v4.13-rc3] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Hari-Prasath/R

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >