Re: [PATCH] remove unused blkdev_dax_capable() function

2016-05-20 Thread Kani, Toshimitsu
FYI, fs/block_dev.c has multiple updates since then including the code in question. I just built tot -next m64 kernel with the attached config file, and confirmed no compile error on the file. -Toshi On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 19:32 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi, > > [auto build test ERROR on

Re: [PATCH] remove unused blkdev_dax_capable() function

2016-05-20 Thread Kani, Toshimitsu
FYI, fs/block_dev.c has multiple updates since then including the code in question. I just built tot -next m64 kernel with the attached config file, and confirmed no compile error on the file. -Toshi On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 19:32 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi, > > [auto build test ERROR on

Re: [PATCH] remove unused blkdev_dax_capable() function

2016-05-20 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi, [auto build test ERROR on next-20160517] [cannot apply to v4.6-rc7 v4.6-rc6 v4.6-rc5 v4.6] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH] remove unused blkdev_dax_capable() function

2016-05-20 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi, [auto build test ERROR on next-20160517] [cannot apply to v4.6-rc7 v4.6-rc6 v4.6-rc5 v4.6] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH] remove unused blkdev_dax_capable() function

2016-05-18 Thread Vishal Verma
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 09:54:08AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The change from blkdev_dax_capable() to bdev_dax_capable() removed the only > user > of the former, so we now get a build warning: > > fs/block_dev.c:1244:13: error: 'blkdev_dax_capable' defined but not used >

Re: [PATCH] remove unused blkdev_dax_capable() function

2016-05-18 Thread Vishal Verma
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 09:54:08AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The change from blkdev_dax_capable() to bdev_dax_capable() removed the only > user > of the former, so we now get a build warning: > > fs/block_dev.c:1244:13: error: 'blkdev_dax_capable' defined but not used >

Re: [PATCH] remove unused blkdev_dax_capable() function

2016-05-18 Thread Toshi Kani
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 09:54 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The change from blkdev_dax_capable() to bdev_dax_capable() removed the > only user of the former, so we now get a build warning: > > fs/block_dev.c:1244:13: error: 'blkdev_dax_capable' defined but not used > [-Werror=unused-function] >  

Re: [PATCH] remove unused blkdev_dax_capable() function

2016-05-18 Thread Toshi Kani
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 09:54 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The change from blkdev_dax_capable() to bdev_dax_capable() removed the > only user of the former, so we now get a build warning: > > fs/block_dev.c:1244:13: error: 'blkdev_dax_capable' defined but not used > [-Werror=unused-function] >  

[PATCH] remove unused blkdev_dax_capable() function

2016-05-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
The change from blkdev_dax_capable() to bdev_dax_capable() removed the only user of the former, so we now get a build warning: fs/block_dev.c:1244:13: error: 'blkdev_dax_capable' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] static bool blkdev_dax_capable(struct block_device *bdev) This

[PATCH] remove unused blkdev_dax_capable() function

2016-05-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
The change from blkdev_dax_capable() to bdev_dax_capable() removed the only user of the former, so we now get a build warning: fs/block_dev.c:1244:13: error: 'blkdev_dax_capable' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] static bool blkdev_dax_capable(struct block_device *bdev) This