On Mon 26 Jun 02:04 PDT 2017, Henri Roosen wrote:
> On 06/25/2017 11:51 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Fri 02 Jun 04:35 PDT 2017, Henri Roosen wrote:
> >
> > > A device might not have an ops structure registered. This
> > > patch fixes a null-prt dereference by checking ops before dereferencin
On 06/25/2017 11:51 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Fri 02 Jun 04:35 PDT 2017, Henri Roosen wrote:
A device might not have an ops structure registered. This
patch fixes a null-prt dereference by checking ops before dereferencing
it.
In what scenario do you end up with a rpdev without ops defin
On Fri 02 Jun 04:35 PDT 2017, Henri Roosen wrote:
> A device might not have an ops structure registered. This
> patch fixes a null-prt dereference by checking ops before dereferencing
> it.
>
In what scenario do you end up with a rpdev without ops defined?
You need at least create_ept defined i
Hi Henri,
On 06/02/2017 06:35 AM, Henri Roosen wrote:
> A device might not have an ops structure registered. This
The rpmsg devices are registered from the respective backends, which are
supposed to plug in their ops. What is the scenario where you think
these ops might not be populated? We ought
A device might not have an ops structure registered. This
patch fixes a null-prt dereference by checking ops before dereferencing
it.
Signed-off-by: Henri Roosen
---
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c b/driver
5 matches
Mail list logo