On 2018-12-07 04:38 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 06/12/2018 15:22:51+0800, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Hi,
Kindly, this format change formats the rtc dump from:
alrm_time : 00:00:00
alrm_date : 1970-01-01
alarm_IRQ : no
alrm_pending
On 06/12/2018 15:22:51+0800, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kindly, this format change formats the rtc dump from:
> alrm_time : 00:00:00
> alrm_date : 1970-01-01
> alarm_IRQ : no
> alrm_pending : no
>
> to:
> alarm time:
On 06/12/2018 15:22:51+0800, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kindly, this format change formats the rtc dump from:
> alrm_time : 00:00:00
> alrm_date : 1970-01-01
> alarm_IRQ : no
> alrm_pending : no
>
> to:
> alarm time:
Hi,
Kindly, this format change formats the rtc dump from:
alrm_time : 00:00:00
alrm_date : 1970-01-01
alarm_IRQ : no
alrm_pending: no
to:
alarm time : 00:00:00
alarm date : 1970-01-01
alarm IRQ
Hi,
Kindly, this format change formats the rtc dump from:
alrm_time : 00:00:00
alrm_date : 1970-01-01
alarm_IRQ : no
alrm_pending: no
to:
alarm time : 00:00:00
alarm date : 1970-01-01
alarm IRQ
Hi,
From 549bae59445c5ec67dd6a46f3ea4f58966d40c9b
Current the struct rtc_wkalrm is dumped as
"alrm_" by printing converted from the struct
name of "alrm.*" directly. Shall we use the
"alarm *" to replace the "alrm_*" during this
dumping?
Signed-off-by: John Zhao
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c |
Hi,
From 549bae59445c5ec67dd6a46f3ea4f58966d40c9b
Current the struct rtc_wkalrm is dumped as
"alrm_" by printing converted from the struct
name of "alrm.*" directly. Shall we use the
"alarm *" to replace the "alrm_*" during this
dumping?
Signed-off-by: John Zhao
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c |
7 matches
Mail list logo