Re: [PATCH] rtc: proc: printf using alarm for alrm

2018-12-10 Thread yuankuiz
On 2018-12-07 04:38 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote: On 06/12/2018 15:22:51+0800, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote: Hi, Kindly, this format change formats the rtc dump from: alrm_time : 00:00:00 alrm_date : 1970-01-01 alarm_IRQ : no alrm_pending

Re: [PATCH] rtc: proc: printf using alarm for alrm

2018-12-06 Thread Alexandre Belloni
On 06/12/2018 15:22:51+0800, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote: > Hi, > > Kindly, this format change formats the rtc dump from: > alrm_time : 00:00:00 > alrm_date : 1970-01-01 > alarm_IRQ : no > alrm_pending : no > > to: > alarm time:

Re: [PATCH] rtc: proc: printf using alarm for alrm

2018-12-06 Thread Alexandre Belloni
On 06/12/2018 15:22:51+0800, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote: > Hi, > > Kindly, this format change formats the rtc dump from: > alrm_time : 00:00:00 > alrm_date : 1970-01-01 > alarm_IRQ : no > alrm_pending : no > > to: > alarm time:

Re: [PATCH] rtc: proc: printf using alarm for alrm

2018-12-05 Thread yuankuiz
Hi, Kindly, this format change formats the rtc dump from: alrm_time : 00:00:00 alrm_date : 1970-01-01 alarm_IRQ : no alrm_pending: no to: alarm time : 00:00:00 alarm date : 1970-01-01 alarm IRQ

Re: [PATCH] rtc: proc: printf using alarm for alrm

2018-12-05 Thread yuankuiz
Hi, Kindly, this format change formats the rtc dump from: alrm_time : 00:00:00 alrm_date : 1970-01-01 alarm_IRQ : no alrm_pending: no to: alarm time : 00:00:00 alarm date : 1970-01-01 alarm IRQ

[PATCH] rtc: proc: printf using alarm for alrm

2018-12-04 Thread yuankuiz
Hi, From 549bae59445c5ec67dd6a46f3ea4f58966d40c9b Current the struct rtc_wkalrm is dumped as "alrm_" by printing converted from the struct name of "alrm.*" directly. Shall we use the "alarm *" to replace the "alrm_*" during this dumping? Signed-off-by: John Zhao --- drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c |

[PATCH] rtc: proc: printf using alarm for alrm

2018-12-04 Thread yuankuiz
Hi, From 549bae59445c5ec67dd6a46f3ea4f58966d40c9b Current the struct rtc_wkalrm is dumped as "alrm_" by printing converted from the struct name of "alrm.*" directly. Shall we use the "alarm *" to replace the "alrm_*" during this dumping? Signed-off-by: John Zhao --- drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c |