Hi Mao,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on tip/locking/core]
[also build test WARNING on v4.18-rc8 next-20180807]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Mao,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on tip/locking/core]
[also build test WARNING on v4.18-rc8 next-20180807]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
This is obviously wrong and you need to at least compile your patches...
regards,
dan carpenter
This is obviously wrong and you need to at least compile your patches...
regards,
dan carpenter
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, Mao Wenan wrote:
> There is no need to have the 'T *v' variable static
> since new value always be assigned before use it.
The code is:
static int prev_max;
/*
* Print this only once. If the admin changes the limit,
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, Mao Wenan wrote:
> There is no need to have the 'T *v' variable static
> since new value always be assigned before use it.
The code is:
static int prev_max;
/*
* Print this only once. If the admin changes the limit,
There is no need to have the 'T *v' variable static
since new value always be assigned before use it.
Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index
There is no need to have the 'T *v' variable static
since new value always be assigned before use it.
Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index
8 matches
Mail list logo