* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Linus, Andrew, what is your thinking about the patch and about
> > the timing of the patch?
>
> Not for 3.8. Queue it for 3.9, with possibly a stable tag with
> a big comment "apply after much testing".
Ok,
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Linus, Andrew, what is your thinking about the patch and about
> the timing of the patch?
Not for 3.8. Queue it for 3.9, with possibly a stable tag with a big
comment "apply after much testing".
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from th
* Alex Shi wrote:
> On 02/05/2013 10:58 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Alex Shi wrote:
> >
> >> Commit 5a50508 change to rwsem from mutex, that cause aim7
> >> fork_test dropped 50%. Yuanhan liu does a good analysis,
> >> find it caused by strict sequential writing. Ingo suggest
> >> ste
On 02/05/2013 10:58 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Alex Shi wrote:
>
>> Commit 5a50508 change to rwsem from mutex, that cause aim7 fork_test
>> dropped 50%. Yuanhan liu does a good analysis, find it caused by
>> strict sequential writing. Ingo suggest stealing sem writing from
>> front task in wai
* Alex Shi wrote:
> Commit 5a50508 change to rwsem from mutex, that cause aim7 fork_test
> dropped 50%. Yuanhan liu does a good analysis, find it caused by
> strict sequential writing. Ingo suggest stealing sem writing from
> front task in waiting queue. https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/29/84
> So h
Commit 5a50508 change to rwsem from mutex, that cause aim7 fork_test
dropped 50%. Yuanhan liu does a good analysis, find it caused by
strict sequential writing. Ingo suggest stealing sem writing from
front task in waiting queue. https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/29/84
So has this patch.
In this patch,
6 matches
Mail list logo