On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 03:04:04PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Sam Ravnborg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:27:52AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > * Roland McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The samples/ subdirectory contains only modules.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:02:57PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I don't have any axe to grind here, I just could not figure out how to get
> the samples/ modules built (without resorting to make M=.../samples/foo and
> clobbering my source directory).
> If there is another plan, point me to its
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:02:57 -0800 (PST) Roland McGrath wrote:
> I don't have any axe to grind here, I just could not figure out how to get
> the samples/ modules built (without resorting to make M=.../samples/foo and
> clobbering my source directory). If there is another plan, point me to its
>
* Sam Ravnborg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:27:52AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Roland McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
> > > The samples/ subdirectory contains only modules.
> > > But the only make run done there is in commands for vmlinux.
> > > I
I don't have any axe to grind here, I just could not figure out how to get
the samples/ modules built (without resorting to make M=.../samples/foo and
clobbering my source directory). If there is another plan, point me to its
documentation. I can't see the point of the Kconfig option for samples
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:27:52AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Roland McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > The samples/ subdirectory contains only modules.
> > But the only make run done there is in commands for vmlinux.
> > I can't see why this was ever done in this nonstandard
> Sam, is this ok with the samples intent ? I think as long as we do not
> include them with the kernel image and have a "make samples" to build
> them, it's ok. Having them built upon make modules seems like a good
> idea to me.
I"m not sure what you mean by "with the kernel image".
AFAICT,
* Roland McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> The samples/ subdirectory contains only modules.
> But the only make run done there is in commands for vmlinux.
> I can't see why this was ever done in this nonstandard fashion.
> As things stand, the modules don't get built by 'make modules'.
>
>
* Roland McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The samples/ subdirectory contains only modules.
But the only make run done there is in commands for vmlinux.
I can't see why this was ever done in this nonstandard fashion.
As things stand, the modules don't get built by 'make modules'.
I
Sam, is this ok with the samples intent ? I think as long as we do not
include them with the kernel image and have a make samples to build
them, it's ok. Having them built upon make modules seems like a good
idea to me.
Im not sure what you mean by with the kernel image.
AFAICT, everything
I don't have any axe to grind here, I just could not figure out how to get
the samples/ modules built (without resorting to make M=.../samples/foo and
clobbering my source directory). If there is another plan, point me to its
documentation. I can't see the point of the Kconfig option for samples
* Sam Ravnborg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:27:52AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Roland McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The samples/ subdirectory contains only modules.
But the only make run done there is in commands for vmlinux.
I can't see why
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:27:52AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Roland McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The samples/ subdirectory contains only modules.
But the only make run done there is in commands for vmlinux.
I can't see why this was ever done in this nonstandard fashion.
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:02:57 -0800 (PST) Roland McGrath wrote:
I don't have any axe to grind here, I just could not figure out how to get
the samples/ modules built (without resorting to make M=.../samples/foo and
clobbering my source directory). If there is another plan, point me to its
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 03:04:04PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Sam Ravnborg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:27:52AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Roland McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The samples/ subdirectory contains only modules.
But the
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:02:57PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
I don't have any axe to grind here, I just could not figure out how to get
the samples/ modules built (without resorting to make M=.../samples/foo and
clobbering my source directory).
If there is another plan, point me to its
The samples/ subdirectory contains only modules.
But the only make run done there is in commands for vmlinux.
I can't see why this was ever done in this nonstandard fashion.
As things stand, the modules don't get built by 'make modules'.
I didn't make the addition of the directory use
The samples/ subdirectory contains only modules.
But the only make run done there is in commands for vmlinux.
I can't see why this was ever done in this nonstandard fashion.
As things stand, the modules don't get built by 'make modules'.
I didn't make the addition of the directory use
18 matches
Mail list logo
