Re: [PATCH] sata_nv: kill old private BMDMA helper functions

2007-02-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Robert Hancock wrote: sata_nv implemented its own copies of the BMDMA helper functions for ADMA, since the ADMA BMDMA status registers are PIO while the other registers are MMIO, and this was the only way to handle this previously. Now that we have iomap support, the standard routines should

Re: [PATCH] sata_nv: kill old private BMDMA helper functions

2007-02-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Robert Hancock wrote: sata_nv implemented its own copies of the BMDMA helper functions for ADMA, since the ADMA BMDMA status registers are PIO while the other registers are MMIO, and this was the only way to handle this previously. Now that we have iomap support, the standard routines should

[PATCH] sata_nv: kill old private BMDMA helper functions

2007-02-20 Thread Robert Hancock
sata_nv implemented its own copies of the BMDMA helper functions for ADMA, since the ADMA BMDMA status registers are PIO while the other registers are MMIO, and this was the only way to handle this previously. Now that we have iomap support, the standard routines should just work, so use them.

[PATCH] sata_nv: kill old private BMDMA helper functions

2007-02-20 Thread Robert Hancock
sata_nv implemented its own copies of the BMDMA helper functions for ADMA, since the ADMA BMDMA status registers are PIO while the other registers are MMIO, and this was the only way to handle this previously. Now that we have iomap support, the standard routines should just work, so use them.