Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix a bug in dl_overflow()

On 2016/04/15 at 15:07, Juri Lelli wrote: > [+Luca] > > Hi, > > On 14/04/16 20:19, Xunlei Pang wrote: >> I got a minus(very big) dl_b->total_bw during my deadline tests. >> >> # grep dl /proc/sched_debug >> dl_rq[0]: >> .dl_nr_running : 0 >> .dl_bw->bw

Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix a bug in dl_overflow()

[+Luca] Hi, On 14/04/16 20:19, Xunlei Pang wrote: > I got a minus(very big) dl_b->total_bw during my deadline tests. > > # grep dl /proc/sched_debug > dl_rq[0]: > .dl_nr_running : 0 > .dl_bw->bw : 996147 > .dl_bw->total_bw : -

[PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix a bug in dl_overflow()

I got a minus(very big) dl_b->total_bw during my deadline tests. # grep dl /proc/sched_debug dl_rq[0]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : -97900 Something unusual must have happened. After some diggi