17.12.2013, 16:47, "Peter Zijlstra" :
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:02:58PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
>> 13.12.2013, 19:42, "Peter Zijlstra" :
>>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:59:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
This patch touches RT group scheduling case.
Functions inc_rt_prio_
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:02:58PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
>
> 13.12.2013, 19:42, "Peter Zijlstra" :
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:59:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> >
> >> This patch touches RT group scheduling case.
> >>
> >> Functions inc_rt_prio_smp() and dec_rt_prio_smp() change (g
13.12.2013, 19:42, "Peter Zijlstra" :
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:59:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
>> This patch touches RT group scheduling case.
>>
>> Functions inc_rt_prio_smp() and dec_rt_prio_smp() change (global) rq's
>> priority,
>> while rt_rq passed to them may be not the top-le
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:59:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> This patch touches RT group scheduling case.
>
> Functions inc_rt_prio_smp() and dec_rt_prio_smp() change (global) rq's
> priority,
> while rt_rq passed to them may be not the top-level rt_rq. This is wrong,
> because
> changing of
Ping!
27.11.2013, 19:59, "Kirill Tkhai" :
> This patch touches RT group scheduling case.
>
> Functions inc_rt_prio_smp() and dec_rt_prio_smp() change (global) rq's
> priority,
> while rt_rq passed to them may be not the top-level rt_rq. This is wrong,
> because
> changing of priority on a child
This patch touches RT group scheduling case.
Functions inc_rt_prio_smp() and dec_rt_prio_smp() change (global) rq's priority,
while rt_rq passed to them may be not the top-level rt_rq. This is wrong,
because
changing of priority on a child level does not guarantee that the priority is
the highest
6 matches
Mail list logo