Hello List!
I'm using the new scheduler since a few days and I have to say that this is an
amazing improvement for gaming loads. When playing enemy-territory the
animations are completly smooth and fluid, without any hiccups. Et runs now
clearly better on Linux than on my Win XP partition (same
On Thursday 22 March 2007 10:36, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 04:29:44 +1100
>
> Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Further improve the deterministic nature of the RSDL cpu scheduler and
> > make the rr_interval tunable.
>
> I might actually need to drop RSDL from next -mm, se
On Thursday 22 March 2007 11:24, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Thursday 22 March 2007 10:48, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
> > Artur Skawina wrote:
> > > Con Kolivas wrote:
> > >> Note no interactive boost idea here.
> > >>
> > >> Patch is for 2.6.21-rc4-mm1. I have not spent the time trying to bring
> > >> ot
On Thursday 22 March 2007 10:48, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
> Artur Skawina wrote:
> > Con Kolivas wrote:
> >> Note no interactive boost idea here.
> >>
> >> Patch is for 2.6.21-rc4-mm1. I have not spent the time trying to bring
> >> other bases in sync.
> >
> > I've tried RSDLv.31+this on 2.6.20.3 as
Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
>> I'm not sure this is going in the right direction... I'm writing
>> this while compiling a kernel w/ "nice -20 make -j2" and X is almost
>>
> Did you mean "nice -20"? If so, that should have slowed X quite a bit.
> Try "nice 19" instead.
i did try "nice --20" too :)
Artur Skawina wrote:
Con Kolivas wrote:
Note no interactive boost idea here.
Patch is for 2.6.21-rc4-mm1. I have not spent the time trying to bring other
bases in sync.
I've tried RSDLv.31+this on 2.6.20.3 as i'm not tracking -mm.
Further improve the deterministic nature of the R
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 04:29:44 +1100
Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Further improve the deterministic nature of the RSDL cpu scheduler and make
> the rr_interval tunable.
I might actually need to drop RSDL from next -mm, see if those sched oopses
whcih several people have reported go away
Con Kolivas wrote:
> Note no interactive boost idea here.
>
> Patch is for 2.6.21-rc4-mm1. I have not spent the time trying to bring other
> bases in sync.
I've tried RSDLv.31+this on 2.6.20.3 as i'm not tracking -mm.
> Further improve the deterministic nature of the RSDL cpu scheduler and make
Hi all
As my time at the pc is limited I unfortunately cannot spend it responding to
the huge number of emails I got in response to RSDL. Instead, here's a patch.
I may be offline for extended periods at a time still so please others feel
free to poke at the code and don't take it personally if I
9 matches
Mail list logo