On 2018-12-25 3:15 p.m., Kangjie Lu wrote:
What we need is only "pack_id", so do not create a heap object or copy
the whole object in. The fix efficiently copies "pack_id" only.
Now this looks like a worthwhile optimization, in some pretty tricky
code. I can't see a security angle in it. Did
What we need is only "pack_id", so do not create a heap object or copy
the whole object in. The fix efficiently copies "pack_id" only.
Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu
---
drivers/scsi/sg.c | 4 ++--
kernel/sched/core.c | 18 --
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Hi Kangjie,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on scsi/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.20 next-20181224]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Kangjie,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on scsi/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.20 next-20181224]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
What we need is only "pack_id", so do not create a heap object or copy
the whole object in. The fix efficiently copies "pack_id" only.
Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu
---
drivers/scsi/sg.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sg.c
5 matches
Mail list logo