From: Kaixu Xia <kaixu...@tencent.com>
The function lpfc_sli_process_sol_iocb() always return 1, so there's no
reason for a return value. In addition, no other functions will use the
return value of lpfc_sli_process_sol_iocb().
Convert lpfc_sli_process_sol_iocb() to a void function, and fix the
following Coccinelle warning:
./drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c:3247:5-7: Unneeded variable: "rc". Return "1" on
line 3372
Reported-by: Tosk Robot <tencent_os_ro...@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixu...@tencent.com>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
index e158cd77d387..45c8cac61c76 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
@@ -3239,12 +3239,11 @@ lpfc_sli_iocbq_lookup_by_tag(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
* is changed to IOSTAT_LOCAL_REJECT/IOERR_SLI_ABORTED.
* This function always returns 1.
**/
-static int
+static void
lpfc_sli_process_sol_iocb(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_sli_ring *pring,
struct lpfc_iocbq *saveq)
{
struct lpfc_iocbq *cmdiocbp;
- int rc = 1;
unsigned long iflag;
cmdiocbp = lpfc_sli_iocbq_lookup(phba, pring, saveq);
@@ -3368,8 +3367,6 @@ lpfc_sli_process_sol_iocb(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct
lpfc_sli_ring *pring,
saveq->iocb.ulpContext);
}
}
-
- return rc;
}
/**
@@ -3761,7 +3758,7 @@ lpfc_sli_sp_handle_rspiocb(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct
lpfc_sli_ring *pring,
switch (type) {
case LPFC_SOL_IOCB:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, iflag);
- rc = lpfc_sli_process_sol_iocb(phba, pring, saveq);
+ lpfc_sli_process_sol_iocb(phba, pring, saveq);
spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, iflag);
break;
--
2.20.0
