On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 19:32:39 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> A previous change removed the initialization of rval and there is
> now an error where an uninitialized rval is being returned on an
> error return path. Fix this by returning -ENODEV.
Applied to 5.10/scsi-queue, thanks!
[1/1] scsi: qla2xxx:
Colin,
> A previous change removed the initialization of rval and there is now
> an error where an uninitialized rval is being returned on an error
> return path. Fix this by returning -ENODEV.
Applied to 5.10/scsi-staging, thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
On 08/10/2020 19:41, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2020-10-08 19:32:39, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King
>>
>> A previous change removed the initialization of rval and there is
>> now an error where an uninitialized rval is being returned on an
>> error return path. Fix this by returning -
> On Oct 8, 2020, at 1:32 PM, Colin King wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> A previous change removed the initialization of rval and there is
> now an error where an uninitialized rval is being returned on an
> error return path. Fix this by returning -ENODEV.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uni
On Thu 2020-10-08 19:32:39, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> A previous change removed the initialization of rval and there is
> now an error where an uninitialized rval is being returned on an
> error return path. Fix this by returning -ENODEV.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialize
From: Colin Ian King
A previous change removed the initialization of rval and there is
now an error where an uninitialized rval is being returned on an
error return path. Fix this by returning -ENODEV.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
Fixes: b994718760fa ("scsi: qla2xxx: Use
6 matches
Mail list logo
