Hi David,
Is this fix fine to you for -stable?
Thanks,
Xufeng
On 06/05/2013 10:55 AM, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
On 06/03/2013 03:52 PM, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
Sorry Greg, David -- I did not fully understand all the details
o
On 06/03/2013 03:52 PM, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
Sorry Greg, David -- I did not fully understand all the details
of the stable kernel process earlier.
I have since checked the networking stable queue here:
http://patchw
On 06/05/2013 08:13 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 10:00 +0800, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
On 06/03/2013 10:28 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:52:58PM +0800, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 10:00 +0800, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
> On 06/03/2013 10:28 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:52:58PM +0800, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
> >
> >> 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >>
> > Really? What are you going to do
On 06/03/2013 10:28 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:52:58PM +0800, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
Really? What are you going to do with it if no one objects?
Sorry, I don't have any experience with st
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:52:58PM +0800, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
> 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
Really? What are you going to do with it if no one objects?
I know I'm sure not going to do anything with it...
(hint, this isn't how you ask for networkin
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Xufeng Zhang
[ Upstream commit 9839ff0dead906e85e4d17490aeff87a5859a157 ]
While sctp handling a duplicate COOKIE-ECHO and the action is
'Association restart', sctp_sf_do_dupcook_a() will proce
On 1/23/13, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 01/23/2013 08:46 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:38:40PM +0800, xufengzhang.m...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> From: Xufeng Zhang
>>>
>>> While sctp handling a duplicate COOKIE-ECHO and the action is
>>> 'Association restart', sctp_sf_do_dupcoo
On 1/23/13, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:38:40PM +0800, xufengzhang.m...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Xufeng Zhang
>>
>> While sctp handling a duplicate COOKIE-ECHO and the action is
>> 'Association restart', sctp_sf_do_dupcook_a() will processing
>> the unexpected COOKIE-ECHO for
On 01/23/2013 08:46 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:38:40PM +0800, xufengzhang.m...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Xufeng Zhang
While sctp handling a duplicate COOKIE-ECHO and the action is
'Association restart', sctp_sf_do_dupcook_a() will processing
the unexpected COOKIE-ECHO for p
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:38:40PM +0800, xufengzhang.m...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Xufeng Zhang
>
> While sctp handling a duplicate COOKIE-ECHO and the action is
> 'Association restart', sctp_sf_do_dupcook_a() will processing
> the unexpected COOKIE-ECHO for peer restart, but it does not set
> t
From: Xufeng Zhang
While sctp handling a duplicate COOKIE-ECHO and the action is
'Association restart', sctp_sf_do_dupcook_a() will processing
the unexpected COOKIE-ECHO for peer restart, but it does not set
the association state to SCTP_STATE_ESTABLISHED, so the association
could stuck in SCTP_S
12 matches
Mail list logo