On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:54:16 -0700
shuah wrote:
> On 11/29/18 2:20 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > Polite reminder
>
> Thanks for the reminder.
>
> >
> >> While GPL2.0 looks about right, the correct and valid identifiers for GPL
> >> v2
On 11/29/18 2:20 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Polite reminder
Thanks for the reminder.
While GPL2.0 looks about right, the correct and valid identifiers for GPL v2
only code are 'GPL-2.0' or 'GPL-2.0-only'.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
Cc:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Polite reminder
> While GPL2.0 looks about right, the correct and valid identifiers for GPL v2
> only code are 'GPL-2.0' or 'GPL-2.0-only'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu
> Cc: Shuah Khan (Samsung OSG)
>
> ---
>
> P.
While GPL2.0 looks about right, the correct and valid identifiers for GPL v2
only code are 'GPL-2.0' or 'GPL-2.0-only'.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu
Cc: Shuah Khan (Samsung OSG)
---
P.S.: checkpatch.pl emits a warning when crappy license ids are used
tools/testing/sel
4 matches
Mail list logo