Re: [LTP] [PATCH] selftests: vdso: hash entry size on alpha, s390x is 8 bytes

- Original Message - > > - Original Message - > > Hi! > > As much as it's worth the changes looks good to me. > > > > @Jan: I guess that we can as well fix this in LTP first then we can try > > to get the kernel version fixed... > > Fine by me, I'll give it couple more da

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] selftests: vdso: hash entry size on alpha, s390x is 8 bytes

- Original Message - > Hi! > As much as it's worth the changes looks good to me. > > @Jan: I guess that we can as well fix this in LTP first then we can try > to get the kernel version fixed... Fine by me, I'll give it couple more days then push it. I did repost it with original

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] selftests: vdso: hash entry size on alpha, s390x is 8 bytes

Hi! As much as it's worth the changes looks good to me. @Jan: I guess that we can as well fix this in LTP first then we can try to get the kernel version fixed... -- Cyril Hrubis chru...@suse.cz

Re: [PATCH] selftests: vdso: hash entry size on alpha,s390x is 8 bytes

On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 08:18:22AM -0400, Jan Stancek wrote: > > Do similar check in parse_vdso.c and treat hash entries as double word. > Ping, any thoughts about the issue or patch? I'd suggest contacting the authors of that code. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH] selftests: vdso: hash entry size on alpha,s390x is 8 bytes

- Original Message - > parse_vdso.c is crashing on 5.8-rc5 s390x, because it wrongly reads > nbucket as 0: > Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. > 0x01000f3e in vdso_sym (version=0x1001280 "LINUX_2.6", > name=0x100128a "__vdso_getcpu") at parse_vdso.c:207 >

[PATCH] selftests: vdso: hash entry size on alpha,s390x is 8 bytes

parse_vdso.c is crashing on 5.8-rc5 s390x, because it wrongly reads nbucket as 0: Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. 0x01000f3e in vdso_sym (version=0x1001280 "LINUX_2.6", name=0x100128a "__vdso_getcpu") at parse_vdso.c:207 207 ELF(Word) chain = vdso_in