> setuid(2) differs from the OpenBSD setuid(2)
> Either I am non compos or the thing is very wrong.
> The docs (man-pages-1.35) say ...
Yes, setuid() has a behaviour that varies a bit from system to system.
Moreover, it has varied in the history of Linux. The manpage may have
been correct when it
setuid(2) differs from the OpenBSD setuid(2) in that -EPERM is
returned by the syscall even if the euid of the process matches the
uid passed to it.
Either I am non compos or the thing is very wrong. The docs
(man-pages-1.35) say
ERRORS
EPERM The user is not the super-user, and uid do
2 matches
Mail list logo
