On Tuesday 19 April 2005 17:41, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 19 April 2005 12:04, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > >
> > > > This + next patch were "modprobe tcrypt" tested.
> > > > See next mail.
> > >
>
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 April 2005 12:04, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> >
> > > This + next patch were "modprobe tcrypt" tested.
> > > See next mail.
> >
> > Could you please send patches inline instead of as attachments.
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 12:04, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>
> > This + next patch were "modprobe tcrypt" tested.
> > See next mail.
>
> Could you please send patches inline instead of as attachments.
> Attachments mean there's more work involved in getting a
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> This + next patch were "modprobe tcrypt" tested.
> See next mail.
Could you please send patches inline instead of as attachments.
Attachments mean there's more work involved in getting at them to read
them, and they are a pain when you want to reply
This + next patch were "modprobe tcrypt" tested.
See next mail.
--
vda
diff -urpN 2.6.12-rc2.0.orig/crypto/sha512.c 2.6.12-rc2.1.be/crypto/sha512.c
--- 2.6.12-rc2.0.orig/crypto/sha512.c Tue Apr 19 00:20:12 2005
+++ 2.6.12-rc2.1.be/crypto/sha512.c Mon Apr 18 23:31:54 2005
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static
5 matches
Mail list logo