On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Any chance this patch could be added to -mm (and possibly mainline)?
>
> Spose I can stick it in -mm.
>
> > It removes a bunch of warnings when building with gcc -W, like these:
> >
Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any chance this patch could be added to -mm (and possibly mainline)?
Spose I can stick it in -mm.
> It removes a bunch of warnings when building with gcc -W, like these:
> include/linux/wait.h:82: warning: missing initializer
> include/linux/wait.h:82:
Hi Andrew,
Any chance this patch could be added to -mm (and possibly mainline)?
It removes a bunch of warnings when building with gcc -W, like these:
include/linux/wait.h:82: warning: missing initializer
include/linux/wait.h:82: warning: (near initialization for
`(anonymous).break_lock')
Hi Andrew,
Any chance this patch could be added to -mm (and possibly mainline)?
It removes a bunch of warnings when building with gcc -W, like these:
include/linux/wait.h:82: warning: missing initializer
include/linux/wait.h:82: warning: (near initialization for
`(anonymous).break_lock')
Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any chance this patch could be added to -mm (and possibly mainline)?
Spose I can stick it in -mm.
It removes a bunch of warnings when building with gcc -W, like these:
include/linux/wait.h:82: warning: missing initializer
include/linux/wait.h:82:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any chance this patch could be added to -mm (and possibly mainline)?
Spose I can stick it in -mm.
It removes a bunch of warnings when building with gcc -W, like these:
include/linux/wait.h:82: warning:
6 matches
Mail list logo