On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 06:54:15PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> I looked at previous related patches, and find the subject should be "ASoC:
> Intel: "
> I will follow it in my future patches.
Right, that's it for these thanks.
> Do I need to send V2 patches?
No, it's OK - I already applied
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 06:54:15PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> I looked at previous related patches, and find the subject should be "ASoC:
> Intel: "
> I will follow it in my future patches.
Right, that's it for these thanks.
> Do I need to send V2 patches?
No, it's OK - I already applied
On 2018/4/13 18:41, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 06:46:21PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
broxton_audio_probe() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as ".probe" in "struct platform_driver".
Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
On 2018/4/13 18:41, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 06:46:21PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
broxton_audio_probe() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as ".probe" in "struct platform_driver".
Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 06:46:21PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> broxton_audio_probe() is never called in atomic context.
> This function is only set as ".probe" in "struct platform_driver".
Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
subsystem. This makes it easier for
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 06:46:21PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> broxton_audio_probe() is never called in atomic context.
> This function is only set as ".probe" in "struct platform_driver".
Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
subsystem. This makes it easier for
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 20:57:43 +0200,
> Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> >
> > On 4/9/18 5:46 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> > > broxton_audio_probe() is never called in atomic context.
> > > This function is only set as ".probe" in "struct
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 20:57:43 +0200,
> Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> >
> > On 4/9/18 5:46 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> > > broxton_audio_probe() is never called in atomic context.
> > > This function is only set as ".probe" in "struct
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> It must be sleepable context as it's a standard platform driver probe
> callback.
> And now looking at grep output, only sound/soc/intel contains so many
> calls with GFP_ATOMIC. I bet that almost all can be done with
> GFP_KERNEL,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> It must be sleepable context as it's a standard platform driver probe
> callback.
> And now looking at grep output, only sound/soc/intel contains so many
> calls with GFP_ATOMIC. I bet that almost all can be done with
> GFP_KERNEL,
On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 20:57:43 +0200,
Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> On 4/9/18 5:46 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> > broxton_audio_probe() is never called in atomic context.
> > This function is only set as ".probe" in "struct platform_driver".
> >
> > Despite never getting called from atomic context,
>
On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 20:57:43 +0200,
Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> On 4/9/18 5:46 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> > broxton_audio_probe() is never called in atomic context.
> > This function is only set as ".probe" in "struct platform_driver".
> >
> > Despite never getting called from atomic context,
>
On 4/9/18 5:46 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
broxton_audio_probe() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as ".probe" in "struct platform_driver".
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
broxton_audio_probe() calls devm_kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which waits busily for
On 4/9/18 5:46 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
broxton_audio_probe() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as ".probe" in "struct platform_driver".
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
broxton_audio_probe() calls devm_kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which waits busily for
broxton_audio_probe() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as ".probe" in "struct platform_driver".
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
broxton_audio_probe() calls devm_kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which waits busily for allocation.
GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary
broxton_audio_probe() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as ".probe" in "struct platform_driver".
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
broxton_audio_probe() calls devm_kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which waits busily for allocation.
GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary
16 matches
Mail list logo