Re: [PATCH] soundwire: clarify SPDX use of GPL-2.0

2020-06-02 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 03:50:13PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > On 6/1/20 12:38 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 01:28:07AM +0800, Bard Liao wrote: > > > From: Pierre-Louis Bossart > > > > > > Change SPDX from GPL-2.0 to GPL-2.0-only for Intel-contributed > > > code.

Re: [PATCH] soundwire: clarify SPDX use of GPL-2.0

2020-06-01 Thread Pierre-Louis Bossart
On 6/1/20 12:38 AM, Greg KH wrote: On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 01:28:07AM +0800, Bard Liao wrote: From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Change SPDX from GPL-2.0 to GPL-2.0-only for Intel-contributed code. This was explicit before the transition to SPDX and lost in translation. It is also explicit in

Re: [PATCH] soundwire: clarify SPDX use of GPL-2.0

2020-05-31 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 01:28:07AM +0800, Bard Liao wrote: > From: Pierre-Louis Bossart > > Change SPDX from GPL-2.0 to GPL-2.0-only for Intel-contributed > code. This was explicit before the transition to SPDX and lost in > translation. It is also explicit in the "GPL-2.0" lines as well, did

[PATCH] soundwire: clarify SPDX use of GPL-2.0

2020-05-31 Thread Bard Liao
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Change SPDX from GPL-2.0 to GPL-2.0-only for Intel-contributed code. This was explicit before the transition to SPDX and lost in translation. No change to the dual-license parts, the only clarification is to the GPL-2.0 term. Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart