From: Anatoly Pugachev
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:53:42 +0300
> Update arch/sparc/lib/* to LGPL-2.0+ to be in order with original
> arch/sparc/lib/COPYING.LIB
>
> sed -i 's/SPDX-License-Identifier: \(.*\) */SPDX-License-Identifier:
> LGPL-2.0+ *\//' arch/sparc/lib/*
>
> Fixes: b24413180f56 ("L
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 03:14:56PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > On 13/06/2019, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Thomas Huth
> >> Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 18:32:53 +0200
> >>
> >>> We already provide the LGPL-2.0 text in LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.0,
> >>> so there is no need for this additional copy
From: Kjetil Oftedal
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:04:28 +0200
> On 13/06/2019, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Thomas Huth
>> Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 18:32:53 +0200
>>
>>> We already provide the LGPL-2.0 text in LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.0,
>>> so there is no need for this additional copy here.
>>>
>>
On 13/06/2019, David Miller wrote:
> From: Thomas Huth
> Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 18:32:53 +0200
>
>> We already provide the LGPL-2.0 text in LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.0,
>> so there is no need for this additional copy here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
>
> Applied.
>
Shouldn't the SPDX licen
From: Thomas Huth
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 18:32:53 +0200
> We already provide the LGPL-2.0 text in LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.0,
> so there is no need for this additional copy here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
Applied.
On 27/05/2019, Thomas Huth wrote:
> We already provide the LGPL-2.0 text in LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.0,
> so there is no need for this additional copy here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
> ---
> arch/sparc/lib/COPYING.LIB | 481 -
> 1 file changed, 481 delet
We already provide the LGPL-2.0 text in LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.0,
so there is no need for this additional copy here.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
---
arch/sparc/lib/COPYING.LIB | 481 -
1 file changed, 481 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/sparc/lib/COPYI
7 matches
Mail list logo