2014/1/8 Mark Brown :
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:15:13AM +0100, Richard Genoud wrote:
>
>> It seems that this patch got lost (or I missed something).
>> As it will now conflict with Wenyou patch "Refactor spi-atmel to use
>> SPI framework queue",
>> should I resent it based on wenyou's path ?
>>
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:15:13AM +0100, Richard Genoud wrote:
> It seems that this patch got lost (or I missed something).
> As it will now conflict with Wenyou patch "Refactor spi-atmel to use
> SPI framework queue",
> should I resent it based on wenyou's path ?
> or on broonie/spi.git for-next
2013/11/8 Mark Brown :
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:34:06AM +0100, Richard Genoud wrote:
>> The only speed available was max_speed (the maximum speed declared for a
>> device).
>> This patch adds the support for spi_tranfer->speed_hz parameter.
>> We can now set a different speed for each spi messa
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:34:06AM +0100, Richard Genoud wrote:
> The only speed available was max_speed (the maximum speed declared for a
> device).
> This patch adds the support for spi_tranfer->speed_hz parameter.
> We can now set a different speed for each spi message.
Applied, thanks.
signa
The only speed available was max_speed (the maximum speed declared for a
device).
This patch adds the support for spi_tranfer->speed_hz parameter.
We can now set a different speed for each spi message.
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud
---
drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c | 92 -
5 matches
Mail list logo