On Thursday 06 December 2012 07:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 11:03:56 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:
Hi,
On 9 November 2012 10:06, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
When spi client does the spi transfer and does not sets
the bits_per_word for each transfer then set it as default
of spi de
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 11:03:56 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9 November 2012 10:06, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> > When spi client does the spi transfer and does not sets
> > the bits_per_word for each transfer then set it as default
> > of spi device in spi core before calling low level tra
Hi,
On 9 November 2012 10:06, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> When spi client does the spi transfer and does not sets
> the bits_per_word for each transfer then set it as default
> of spi device in spi core before calling low level transfer.
I like that (not that it counts ... )!
> Removing the simila
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:36:45PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> When spi client does the spi transfer and does not sets
> the bits_per_word for each transfer then set it as default
> of spi device in spi core before calling low level transfer.
>
> Removing the similar code from spi-tegra20-slin
When spi client does the spi transfer and does not sets
the bits_per_word for each transfer then set it as default
of spi device in spi core before calling low level transfer.
Removing the similar code from spi-tegra20-slink driver as
it is not required.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan
Cc: Stephe
5 matches
Mail list logo